meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
The Rabbi Sacks Legacy

Does Love Conquer All? (Ki Teitse 5780)

The Rabbi Sacks Legacy

Rabbi Lord Jonathan Sacks

Religion & Spirituality

4.8601 Ratings

🗓️ 24 August 2020

⏱️ 11 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

Here is the audio recording of Rabbi Sacks' Covenant & Conversation commentary essay on this week's Torah portion of Ki Teitse 5780. You can download a PDF of this commentary, as well as an accompanying Family Edition, from rabbisacks.org/ki-teitse-5780/

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

Kietzei, does love conquer all? Our parasha contains more laws than any other. Some of them have generated

0:09.7

much study and debate, especially two at the beginning, the law of the captive woman and that of the

0:15.0

stubborn and rebellious son. There is, however, one law that deserves much more attention than it has generally received,

0:23.5

namely the one place between these two. It concerns the laws of inheritance. It says,

0:29.6

if a man has two wives and he loves one but not the other and both bear him sons, but the first

0:34.6

born is the son of the wife he doesn't love. When he wills his property

0:39.7

to his sons, he must not give the rights of the firstborn to the son of the wife he loves,

0:45.3

in preference to his actual firstborn, the son of the wife he doesn't love. He must acknowledge

0:51.1

the son of his unloved wife as he firstborn by giving him a double share of all he has.

0:57.0

That son is the first sign of his father's strength, the right of the firstborn belongs to him.

1:04.0

Note that the Hebrew word here translated as does not love or unloved is Sunua, which normally means hated. We'll see later why this

1:13.9

strong word is used. Now on the face of it, this is straightforward. It's a logical law. It tells us

1:19.6

that love must not override justice. The firstborn in ancient Israel and elsewhere have special

1:27.2

rights, especially in connection with inheritance.

1:29.7

In most societies, they tended to succeed to their father's position.

1:34.2

That was the case in Israel in relation to kingship and priesthood.

1:38.3

They didn't inherit all the father's property, but they did inherit twice as much as the other children. It was important to have

1:45.8

rules like the above to avoid damaging family splits every time a death occurred or was imminent.

1:52.2

The Torah gives us a graphic example of the court intrigue that went on as David lay dying

1:57.4

as to which of his children should be his heir. More recently,

2:02.0

Lahavdil, there have been several examples of Hasidic dynasties irreparably torn apart

2:08.6

because different groups wanted different individuals to inherit the leadership. There is a tension

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Rabbi Lord Jonathan Sacks, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of Rabbi Lord Jonathan Sacks and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2025.