This is Hidden Killers Week in review.

I look back at the most prolific stories of the week.

This is Hidden Killers with Tony Bruske.

Here now, Tony Bruske.

We're going to find out more info because there is new vehicle data that's going to be used in this trial.

And that's not going to lie.

That's also going to tell us when Karen karen reed made those voicemails

or sent those voicemails and started making the 50 some phone calls uh after she left supposedly

it'll be interesting to see well what time were those made was she was she still sitting in that

car waiting for him?

Was she nearby?

That's going to be a real interesting piece of all of this as a new piece of data.

The dog bite information is going to come on, but they can't use the word Chloe.

They have to identify it as a dog.

And they're also, they are going to bring in,

from what I understand, some of the bite mark pieces of this, the dog's molding of and everything to see, does this match up with John O'Keefe's bite wounds, something they did not do last time, which I was really

puzzled by, but maybe because it could go very badly for either side and neither wanted to roll the

dice on it. And that's what it would take. So like we were saying, in order to counteract the

laws of probability, you're going to need need very very factual data points like that in order

to do it you know and it's kind of like you know the koberger case i have to not been for for one

single touch point dna data point there's a lot of things in there that wouldn't fall in line

because the laws of probability but in this case case, you know, it's everything is against

...