All right, Alexander, let's talk about the Supreme Court ruling in Colorado, the Colorado

Supreme Court ruling with Trump being on the ballots, or not being on the ballot in 2024,

actually. So what is your take on this ruling from the Colorado Supreme Court?

Well, I am absolutely astonished by it.

It makes absolutely no sense to me, legally speaking.

It didn't seem to make much sense to three of the seven judges on the Colorado Supreme Court,

including the Chief Justice of Colorado, who made it absolutely clear that he was very skeptical about the entire process, whereby this case came before the court in the first

place, and he thought that there were serious questions of due process there. It's the understatement

of the age, by the way.

I cannot believe that the Supreme Court of the United States,

which will be ruling on this question in January,

is going to uphold this decision.

I am confident.

I am, in fact, so confident I'm all but sure

that the Supreme Court of the United States will set it aside.

And, you know, I could go into the weeds. In fact, I will go briefly into the weeds. I'll explain why there are aspects of this decision, which seem to me to be very strange, to the point of being bizarre.

Firstly, there is the predicate that Trump engaged in an insurrection against the government of the United States. Now, that is purely

something that has been talked about in courts, but there is no actual judgment, final judgment,

what lawyers call res judicata decision that actually says that. He hasn't been prosecuted

on the basis of, you know, leading an

insurrection or trying to overthrow the government of the United States. There's lots of

cases against him, but none of them allege that. Everybody has their opinions about it.

...