meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
The Emily Show

Diddy's Lawyers Claim Criminal Case is Sexist & Demands Access to Videos

The Emily Show

Baker Media, LLC.

True Crime, Entertainment News, News

4.91.9K Ratings

🗓️ 16 January 2025

⏱️ 4 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

Diddy's lawyers argue that the videos in the sex trafficking case against him should be made available to the defense. They argue that the videos will show that the relationship was consensual and that the government's case is sexist.

The defense also claims that the government is "kink shaming" Diddy and that the victim was consenting. The government has offered to have a neutral expert enhance the videos, but the defense has refused.

Watch the full coverage: https://www.youtube.com/live/RgYrgSJBYEA



This podcast uses the following third-party services for analysis:

Spotify Ad Analytics - https://www.spotify.com/us/legal/ad-analytics-privacy-policy/
Podscribe - https://podscribe.com/privacy

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

Welcome back. It's time for a quick bit clip. The full episode will be linked in the description,

0:05.7

but this is the quick bit clip to keep you in the loop for everything that's happening on the

0:11.1

live stream channel. Let's get into it. Well, Diddy's lawyers are definitely not slowing down

0:17.5

on the allegations and the defense that this relationship with Diddy and Cassie

0:23.3

Victim One was a consensual relationship.

0:26.2

They say that the videos they've reviewed with police, which is not unusual in cases that

0:32.0

deal with sensitive videos, they say that those videos have to be disclosed and given digitally to the defense because they

0:39.2

want to show them to experts. They want to digitally enhance the audio and video. They want to examine

0:45.4

the metadata and they want to be able to use those videos to show to witnesses and experts. They

0:53.3

argue that those videos undermine the government's case that there was sex trafficking

0:59.3

here and argue at some point that the government's case is sexist because it does not

1:09.1

account for women having autonomy and agency, and they are saying,

1:15.0

this is the defense argument, that the videos clearly show a consensual encounter and that it

1:23.6

undermines what the victim has previously said. Those are the arguments the defense is

1:30.3

going with at this point to try to get the protective order changed. Will this be heavily litigated?

1:35.9

Yes. Is it uncommon in cases that deal with videos of an extremely sensitive nature that those

1:43.0

videos are made available to review in the police custody and with police there.

1:49.4

Yes, that is common.

1:51.5

Will we see the court changing this?

1:53.7

We'll see.

1:54.7

Could the court require a forensic copy of the metadata to be sent to the defense and not the videos, the court could do that.

2:03.7

The government also offered to have a neutral expert enhance the videos for sound and to take away

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Baker Media, LLC., and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of Baker Media, LLC. and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2025.