Select fully managed iPhone, iPad and Mac for your employees no matter where they work.

Select a sustainable and affordable trade in an upgrade plan with access to local Apple experts across the UK.

Select fewer worries for your business.

Select Apple Business Partners, local to you.

Visit selectonline.com forward slash business to speak to the team.

This is Hidden Killers with Tony Brewski.

The latest hearing in the Karen Reid case did not just focus on evidence.

It turned into a courtroom showdown over credibility, legal ethics, and potential misconduct.

The judge did not rule immediately, which means she's carefully weighing the prosecution's claims

that Reid's defense team hid financial ties with expert witnesses and possibly influenced testimony.

This raises huge questions, not just about the legal battle, but about how investigations are conducted, how evidence is handled, and whether bias could be a play in the courtroom.

Jennifer Coffin-Daffert, retired FBI special agent, joining us, Jen, as you've dealt with

high-stakes investigations where credibility is everything, from an investigative standpoint,

how do we separate legitimate concerns about legal misconduct from potential courtroom

theatrics and what signs do you look for to determine whether bias or manipulation may be at play here?

Well, hi, Tony.

And I think the number one thing you look for is corroboration of such allegations.

In this case, there is a signed agreement, an expert agreement.

There is fiduciary proof that money changed hands.

There are trial transcripts that include not only what was said in open court, but also what was said in sidebar.

And so you may recall Judge Canoni, the first thing she did at the

beginning of that hearing was she said, uh, I want my sidebar transcript entered into evidence as an

...