meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
Worldly

Did al-Qaeda win?

Worldly

Vox Media Podcast Network

News, Politics, News Commentary

4.41.8K Ratings

🗓️ 13 September 2018

⏱️ 30 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

Zack, Jenn, and Alex break down the debate over the legacy of the 9/11 attacks: Did al-Qaeda get what it wanted? On Elsewhere, we look at Russia’s latest bizarre attempt to deflect blame for the UK spy poisoning by posting a questionable interview with the supposed suspects. Zack makes an epistemology joke, Alex negs Salisbury, and Jenn labels Russians a “tropical people.” References: The Foreign Policy article that kicked off this conversation. During the conversation about torture in the US, Jenn mentioned a Dick Cheney quote and Alex referenced a quote from President Obama. Jenn recommends this article for deeper understanding about al-Qaeda’s goal of bleeding America economically and militarily to convince the country to get out of the Middle East. She also cited this statement of the organization’s goals from 1998. And here’s more on the “Why aren’t we attacking Sweden?” argument. Ayman al-Zawahiri’s Knights Under the Prophet’s Banner recounts his early days in Egypt, and Gilles Kepel’s book Muslim Extremism in Egypt: The Prophet and Pharaoh talks about the history of the jihadi movement in Egypt. And Jenn recommends this article about US counterterrorism assistance to Egypt in the 1990s. More on Jared Kushner’s friendship with Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed Bin Salman. Jenn read from two Al Qaeda 9/11 anniversary messages, one from 2017 and one from this week. Zack mentioned research into the Iraq war’s role in the 2008 recession, and the fact that people born after 9/11 are now able to enlist. The RT interview that we discussed in Elsewhere. And an explanation of Johny Johny, for listeners fortunate enough to have so far avoided this corner of the internet. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

Welcome to worldly part of the Vox Media Podcast Network. It's me Zach Be Beecham, with Jen Williams and Alex Ward.

0:15.0

Hi. Hey everybody.

0:17.0

So this week, as you probably know, was the 17th anniversary of the 9-11 attacks.

0:21.8

There's been a ton of coverage, and a lot of it's been very good, but we really

0:26.6

thought a lot about this one article in foreign policy that looked back at what's happened

0:30.7

since the attacks and came to a surprising conclusion.

0:33.4

Al Qaeda won.

0:35.6

When we started talking about it ourselves, we found that we kind of disagreed both with the

0:40.3

article and with each other, so we thought that we'd spend the episode laying out the case

0:45.3

for both sides of the argument, that Al-Qaeda got what it wanted out of the attacks,

0:49.8

and that the attacks didn't accomplish their objectives,

0:53.3

that they didn't work.

0:55.4

Now, let's start with some basic background about this.

0:58.4

Give us a quick refresh on what's going on with Al Qaeda

1:01.0

and how they were thinking about these attacks?

1:03.4

So Al Qaeda when they launched the 9-11 attacks, the entire goal and their entire strategy

1:10.2

just kind of in general was to attack the United States and basically make the

1:15.8

cost of US support for dictators and US involvement in general in the Middle East so high that we would eventually decide to

1:25.1

pull out and stop supporting these dictators, right?

1:28.0

So they have this strategy, the near enemy versus the far enemy, and basically the United

1:32.4

States is the far enemy. They the United States is the far enemy they wanted to

1:33.9

attack us first because we back all these dictators in the Middle East they want to

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Vox Media Podcast Network, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of Vox Media Podcast Network and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2025.