requires that we have knowledge of the laws of physics and that the regularity in nature maintains, right?

If the regularity didn't maintain, we wouldn't be able to explain anything because it wouldn't maintain its identity over time.

So if your premise one is a miracle based on your naturalistic view is something that can't be explained definitionally by the laws of physics and the regularity of

nature, which is the other way you explain things in reality, right? I'm saying those things

themselves can't be to get, get explained by those laws. They just exist, right? Honestly, to be

honest with you, Jim Bob, it sounds like a word game to try and convince people that I somehow accept a miracle when I don't. I don't see the miracle in this case.

We're talking about rising from the dead. We're talking about things that we've read in ancient

text and here we are playing this game. Can you define the meaning of truth by the word truth and stuff like that. And I'm going like, I don't.

I understand.

I don't see a miracle in any of that, though.

I don't understand that.

I don't know.

Truth and stuff like that.

Hello, Jay.

You got an echo, Dyer.

There he goes.

That's all.

That's all.

That's all I really want to run with you.

Derek, it up that's all that's all I really want to run with you Derek I know you have to eat

but this is one guest you wanted to come on and ask a couple questions

Jay me oh yeah am I the guest yeah you're you're the guest now

...