This is the Hidden Killers podcast with Tony Brewski and continuing coverage of the case against Karen Reid.

Oh, here we go in the case against Karen Reid. First time we've talked now, Bob, since the trial has begun. And I'm just going to open it right up to you. What has been, you know, first standout moment for you.

And then we'll kind of take it back to the start in openings.

But overall, this far, what's been standing out to you?

You got to go to the openings.

I thought the openings were effective for both parties.

I thought you could see right away,

Brennan's going to try an entirely different case than Lally did.

And, you know, he went through his entire theory of the case in a very calm, rational way,

in terms of laying out the facts.

He didn't have to, he had it all committed to memory.

I thought he gave a strong opening, you know.

And I thought that Jackson was brilliant.

You know, I just did.

You know, like I'm biased.

I'm a defense attorney guy. So, you know, like I get, You know, I just did. You know, and like I'm biased. I'm a defense attorney. So, you know, like, like I get, you know, I'll get like a law hard on when I'm like watching a lawyer give like a great opening.

And I thought, I thought Jackson knocked out out of the park. You know, whether or not both of these guys are going to be able to deliver on everything

that they promised, that's what we watched the trial for. You know, because ultimately, you have

to concern yourself with that. When you build expectations in opening arguments or, excuse me,

opening statements, excuse me, the jury is going to, hold on, I got to lose

that pod.

When you have, you know, when you have opening statements go down and you make promises to jurors,

...