meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
Defenders Podcast

Defenders: Excursus on Natural Theology (Part 32): The Problem of Evil and Suffering (3)

Defenders Podcast

William Lane Craig

Christianity, Society & Culture, Religion & Spirituality, Philosophy

4.7724 Ratings

🗓️ 24 November 2022

⏱️ 43 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

Welcome to Defenders, the teaching class of Dr. William Lane Craig, today, and excurses

0:10.0

on Natural Theology, Part 32.

0:13.2

For more resources from Dr. Craig, go to reasonable faith.org.

0:17.9

We've been talking about the logical version of the problem of evil, and I explained last time that the burden of proof that it lays upon the atheist's shoulders is simply too heavy to be sustained, and that this fact is now widely recognized by both atheist and theist philosophers alike.

0:43.3

And therefore, this is not really an issue of hot debate anymore.

0:48.3

Those of those people who say that philosophy never makes any progress can be refuted by simply pointing

0:57.6

to this problem.

0:58.8

For hundreds of years, from the time of Epicurus, hundreds of years before Christ until the

1:04.8

1970s, the logical version of the problem of evil was the standard statement of this problem and objection.

1:14.1

And now it has been widely recognized that this problem, in fact, is bankrupt, that it's been

1:21.4

resolved, that in fact no one is able to show that the coexistence of God and the suffering and evil in the world

1:29.2

are logically incompatible with each other. But that then throws us on to the probabilistic

1:37.1

or the evidential problem of evil, which does remain very much a matter of debate among philosophers today.

1:46.0

And this is a much more powerful version of the problem.

1:51.0

Since its conclusion is more modest, namely it's improbable that God exists, the burden of proof

1:59.0

that it lays on the atheist is much lighter and therefore can be said

2:05.5

to be an easier argument to sustain. So how might we respond to the atheist claim that the

2:13.5

evil and the suffering in the world makes it improbable that God exists. Well, I want to make three

2:21.1

points by way of response to this argument. First, we're not in a good position to say that it's

2:31.8

improbable that God has good reasons for permitting the suffering in the world.

2:37.0

We're not in a good position to be able to say that it's improbable

2:42.0

that God has good reasons for permitting the suffering in the world.

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from William Lane Craig, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of William Lane Craig and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2025.