meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
Defenders Podcast

Defenders: Excursus on Natural Theology (Part 13): 2nd Scientific Confirmation of the Beginning of the Universe

Defenders Podcast

William Lane Craig

Christianity, Society & Culture, Religion & Spirituality, Philosophy

4.7724 Ratings

🗓️ 7 July 2022

⏱️ 35 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

Welcome to Defenders, the teaching class of Dr. William Lane Craig, today, and excurses

0:10.0

on Natural Theology, Part 13.

0:13.4

For more resources from Dr. Craig, go to reasonable faith.org.

0:17.9

We've been looking at the Kalam cosmological argument, particularly the second premise that the universe began to exist.

0:24.6

And last time we finished looking at the first scientific confirmation of that premise, which is based upon the expansion of the universe.

0:34.6

Now if this weren't enough, there is actually a second scientific confirmation of the beginning of the universe. Now, if this weren't enough, there is actually a second scientific confirmation

0:39.7

of the beginning of the universe, and this one comes from the second law of thermodynamics.

0:46.6

According to the second law, unless energy is being fed into a system, that system will become increasingly disorderly.

0:58.6

Now, already in the 19th century, scientists realized that the second law implied a grim

1:05.5

prediction for the future of the universe. Given enough time, all of the energy in the universe

1:13.6

will eventually spread itself out, evenly throughout the universe. The universe will become

1:20.9

a featureless soup in which no life is possible. And once the universe reaches such a state, no further significant

1:31.0

change is possible. It is a state of equilibrium. And scientists call this state of thermodynamic

1:40.8

equilibrium, the heat death of the universe.

1:45.6

But this unwelcome prediction of the future raised a further puzzle.

1:51.5

If given enough time the universe will eventually stagnate in a state of heat death, then why if it has existed forever is it not now in a state

2:06.8

of heat death? If in a finite amount of time the universe will reach equilibrium,

2:14.8

then why is it not now in a state of equilibrium if it has existed for infinite

2:20.3

time? Given infinite past time, the universe should by now already be in a state of thermodynamic

2:31.3

equilibrium. But obviously it's not. We're in a state of disequilibrium,

2:39.0

where energy is still available to be used and the universe has an orderly structure.

2:47.0

The 19th century Austrian physicist Ludwig Boltzmann presented a daring solution to this problem.

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from William Lane Craig, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of William Lane Craig and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2025.