This is a clip from Dawn of Discernment.

You can access the entire episode now on our website and all podcast platforms.

It's interesting because you're taught in university about coax postulates.

You're taught about sort of the literature in such a positive way it's like oh all the literature has proven

contagion it's proven we've done the coax postulates right but you never go read a coax

postulates paper right so that's what I did I went and read the papers and I thought thought, okay, this will be easy. You know, my professors tell me that, you know, we have papers and hundreds of times where there's contagion, been proven, and coaxe postulates has been conducted over and over again. It's not a big deal. All the virology papers show true isolation of a virus, right? So I'm like, okay, this will be easy.

I'll go and find the papers.

I'll send it to Dr. Kaufman.

He'll change his mind.

We'll have a good laugh and all will be good.

So I go and read the papers.

And you know, you realize quickly that if you understand anything about the scientific method,

there needs to be isolated variables, right?

We have to account for confounding

variables and at least acknowledge them. And in these papers, in the vaccine trials, in the

Cox Postula papers, in the contagion studies, and you name it, the results just weren't there. Like, even the original papers generally conclude

that, you know, we didn't really do coax postulates. We kind of had to do this, you know,

but still it's used as an evidence point. Even though we have 100, maybe even a thousand

failed contagion papers, we still use the

backfill of, oh, it's because they had strong immune system. Oh, it's because of this. So it's because

of that. And then we just get into this theoretical backfill, which again is what's taught

in lecture at university. We're taught that there's a herd immunity, but there's no paper that that proves such a thing.

...