meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
Marketplace Tech

Dating apps fail to protect some users from predators, Mother Jones finds

Marketplace Tech

Marketplace

Technology, News

4.51.3K Ratings

🗓️ 16 August 2023

⏱️ 13 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

Warning: This episode contains references to sexual abuse and violence.

Whether for a hookup or to find true love, 3 out of 10 American adults say they have used a dating app, according to the Pew Research Center. But an investigation out Wednesday from Mother Jones looks into how these apps can also incubate abuse, finding that companies like Grindr and Match Group have failed to protect some of their users from predators. At the heart of this story is this question: Is that the companies’ responsibility? The tech industry has long argued the answer is no, thanks to Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, which protects internet companies from liability for content posted xx on their sites. Abby Vesoulis is the author of the Mother Jones investigation. Her story begins with Matthew Herrick, whose ex-boyfriend created fake profiles of him on Grindr.

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

Marketplace Morning Reports' new Skin in the Game series explores what we can learn about

0:04.6

money and careers from the $300 billion video game industry. Plus, here how an Oakland-based

0:11.0

program helps young people get the skills they need to break into this booming industry.

0:15.9

Listen to Skin in the Game and more from the Marketplace Morning Report wherever you get your

0:20.7

podcasts. The tech industries get out of jail free card, gets challenged by users of dating apps.

0:29.2

From American Public Media, this is Marketplace Tech. I'm Lily Jamali.

0:43.7

Whether for a hook-up or to find true love, three out of every 10 American adults say they've

0:49.5

used a dating app. But an investigation out today from Mother Jones looks into how these apps

0:55.5

can also incubate abuse, finding that companies like Grindr and Match Group have failed to protect

1:02.0

some of their users from predators. At the heart of this story is this question, is that their

1:08.0

responsibility? The tech industry has long argued that the answer is no thanks to 26 words in section

1:15.4

230 of the Communications Decency Act, which became law in Get This 1996. Abby Vassulis is the author

1:24.9

of that investigation. Her story begins with Matthew Herrick, whose ex-boyfriend created fake

1:30.5

profiles of him on Grindr. And a warning that our conversation contains references to sexual abuse

1:37.3

and violence. They said that he was into orgies and violent sex. And worst of all, they said that

1:43.9

he had rape fantasies. And so over the course of these 10 months, over 1100 men showed up at

1:52.1

Matthew's house. They showed up at his workplace. They followed him into public restrooms. And all

1:58.9

the while Grindr was ignoring Matthew's pleas for help. So Matthew took them to court. And

2:07.1

and ultimately Grindr was found not to be responsible for the fake profiles that the ex was making.

2:13.3

And this is not that big of a surprise that that case didn't go anywhere because of the way

2:19.8

section 230 works. Can you talk us through that? Yeah. So section 230 was written in 1996 in the

2:26.4

very nascent days of the internet when it was really just rudimentary chat forums. Now the internet

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Marketplace, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of Marketplace and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.