5 • 2.3K Ratings
🗓️ 18 November 2025
⏱️ 103 minutes
🧾️ Download transcript
Click on a timestamp to play from that location
| 0:00.0 | Hello, my friends, welcome back. If you're back, that is. And I guess you are since we're talking now, |
| 0:05.5 | but I really hope you came back after last week's lesson on Section 132 and the prior sections. |
| 0:11.6 | That was a long one. I tried to make it as quick as I could, but two hours is all we could do. |
| 0:17.2 | And it was a hard one, especially at the end when we had to talk about plural marriage. |
| 0:21.4 | The, I mean, it's honestly, it's interesting because today we're going to only cover two sections, |
| 0:25.8 | so breathe easy. It's going to be an easier week on us. |
| 0:29.0 | Section 133 and 134, and in some ways, the doctrine and covenants is coming to its close. |
| 0:35.5 | Some would say that today is the official end point because |
| 0:39.3 | Section 133 is the appendix of the doctrine covenants. It was intended by the Lord to be the end, |
| 0:45.0 | the final revelation. We still have revelations beyond it, but those kind of fit differently. |
| 0:50.3 | And some might even say that we should have had the appendix one section earlier because section 132 has kind of a tenuous hold in our canon. |
| 0:59.0 | It was added later, though revealed by Joseph Smith, but originally it was revealed for private consumption rather than public distribution. |
| 1:08.0 | It was a revelation that came at Hiram Smith's request to try to |
| 1:14.0 | help Emma Smith understand plural marriage where it was coming from and who was standing behind it |
| 1:19.4 | as lawgiver. But some, I mean, it's, again, a tricky thing. Did it need to be canonized |
| 1:25.7 | during a period of intense anti-polligamy legislation on the government's part? Does it still need to be canonized during a period of intense anti-apologamy legislation on the |
| 1:28.9 | government's part? Does it still need to be canonized today? Could we pick and choose and canonize or |
| 1:35.4 | keep canonized the part on celestial marriage and decanonize the part on plural marriage since it no |
| 1:41.7 | longer applies? There's controversy there. There is |
| 1:45.4 | wrestling on both sides of the issue and there are wonderful people of good faith on both sides |
| 1:51.7 | of this that really wrestle with Section 132's place in the canon of Scripture at all. |
| 1:58.4 | I hope we don't throw out the baby with the bathwater and eliminate the doctrine of eternal marriage as we're concerned and wrestle with the doctrine |
... |
Transcript will be available on the free plan in 1 days. Upgrade to see the full transcript now.
Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Jared Halverson, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.
Generated transcripts are the property of Jared Halverson and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.
Copyright © Tapesearch 2025.