4.8 • 2.4K Ratings
🗓️ 19 September 2022
⏱️ 77 minutes
🧾️ Download transcript
Click on a timestamp to play from that location
0:00.0 | Hey everyone, it's James Lindsay. Welcome back to the new Discourses podcast. If you've |
0:24.1 | been listening in cereal, you know we've done a few hard episodes in a row now. So let's |
0:29.4 | do something a little easier for a few. What I want to give you today is a message, a very |
0:36.1 | simple message. In fact, it's going to mirror an essay that by the time this is out, it will |
0:40.7 | have been published on new discourses and hopefully made some rounds bearing the title three |
0:46.0 | terms, Communists redefined to subvert society. And so as you know, the way that the kind of |
0:54.0 | woke Marxist agenda proceeds is by redefining words or one of the ways, one of the most important |
1:00.1 | forms of its activism. And as a matter of fact, what I want to make a case for you in this episode, |
1:06.2 | and then I'll give you these three terms and discuss them along with a couple of others, |
1:10.4 | but focusing on these three terms and how they build on one another, which are inclusion, |
1:16.1 | democracy and citizenship, by the way. What I want to give you is a general principle of what |
1:23.3 | critique actually is. And to understand when they say critical theory, the thing at the heart of |
1:28.6 | that is critique, where we go back to Marx, and he says the critique of religion is the beginning |
1:33.7 | of his entire program, for example, in his critique of Hegel's philosophy of the right that he wrote |
1:40.2 | in 1844. This critique I want to make the case is a very specific meaning that we could go read |
1:47.0 | from Alison Bailey. I've done that. In fact, I did a new discourses bullet episode on that. It's |
1:52.0 | all over the place in my writings. I've quoted it not just at length, but in full multiple pages |
1:58.2 | out of the journal Hype Asia, where she explains a difference between critical thinking, which is |
2:02.8 | based on epistemic adequacy. She says, soundness, validity of argument, and so on evidentiary basis. |
2:10.0 | That's about understanding what's true. And then she compares that to critical theory, which is |
2:15.1 | something that arises from neo-Marxism, she says, and the Frankfurt School, and is actually about |
2:20.9 | interrogating power dynamics and power structures. And so critical theory or critical Marxism |
... |
Please login to see the full transcript.
Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from New Discourses, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.
Generated transcripts are the property of New Discourses and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.
Copyright © Tapesearch 2025.