This is a special report from True Crime Today and the Hidden Killers podcast.

Karen Reid back in court today for another hearing as we're getting closer and closer to her scheduled April 1st trial date.

Let's go to the courtroom now to get the latest this witness has a report

and a report is not admissible and can't be shown to the jury and so to have the defense

summarize her testimony when she's not allowed to put her report in herself.

Seems a bit unbalanced. There are references on this potential chalk that lists

troopers' names. Those names shouldn't be on there, but also it doesn't give the full picture of the actual testimony.

The issue regarding glass, I expect, is going to be a issue in the next case.

And I say that because we learned last night for the first time on a public airing of an episode

that the defendant suggests that Mr. O'Keefe took her vodka

soda glass out of her car. Now that is the first time we've had any statements from Ms. Reed

suggesting that and also there was another statement regarding a claim that Ms. Reed suggesting that. And also, there was another statement regarding a claim

that Ms. Reed pulled glass from John O'Kee's face.

Never heard that before.

So we have this evolving or new testimony,

or statement, rather, statements about glass.

And so I think first, I'd like to consider this new information that we just learned last night.

And secondly, I am reluctant to agree to a simple summary of part of the witness's testimony

that has not only labels on it, but does not, from my perspective, clarify anything.

I'm not opposed to chalks. I think chalks will help for both sides, and I think the liberal use of chalk is helpful.

But I don't have confidence this chalk accurately summarizes the witness's testimony.

I'm hoping to discussing chalks with the defense and perhaps learning

...