meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
Laura Coates Live

Congress on the Verge of $900B Covid-19 Relief Deal

Laura Coates Live

CNN

News

3.92.5K Ratings

🗓️ 17 December 2020

⏱️ 50 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

First, Chris discusses the potential congressional covid-19 relief bill with Dana Bash and David Gregory. Then, Anthony Scaramucci and Jim Schultz join Chris to discuss Trump seeking special counsel to look into Hunter Biden and the 2020 Election. Chris wraps up the show with Dr. Sanjay Gupta on record covid-19 deaths and hospitalizations as vaccines prepare to roll out. To learn more about how CNN protects listener privacy, visit cnn.com/privacy Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

Thank you, Anderson. I am Chris Cuomo and welcome to Primetime.

0:03.4

Why do you think about this? You know, in America, we refer to our highest officials as honorable.

0:09.8

An example.

0:12.8

The honorable Ron Johnson, a senator from the state of Wisconsin.

0:16.8

The honorable Mitch McConnell, a senator from the Commonwealth of Kentucky.

0:20.7

The honorable Rand Paul, a senator from the Commonwealth of Kentucky.

0:24.9

I picked those three cats for a reason and I'll get to it in a second, but

0:27.9

this matters. Okay. All over the world, this term is used. They spell it differently, but it's

0:34.4

the same word. Okay. Different languages, same meaning. Very specific choices of who gets called

0:40.1

honorable. It is precious and prized. I remember as a kid asking my mom why Pops male said honorable

0:49.6

on an H-O-N period. She said, because Pops works very hard helping people, so people respect and

0:56.5

look up to them. I was swelled with pride about that. Is it still true?

1:02.8

Is it honorable to ignore the pandemic? They did. Is it honorable to now spend time doing this,

1:11.1

where that roll call came from, the Senate Homeland Security Committee holding a hearing about

1:15.9

irregularities during the election that Johnson and the other Republicans know a amount to nothing.

1:22.7

How do we know? Johnson said as much, so why do it? I don't see anything dangerous about evaluating

1:32.0

information, about doing legitimate congressional oversight. Nothing dangerous about that whatsoever.

1:40.5

I mean, did you mean to have that trace of irony in what you were saying? If you're confident enough

1:46.5

Senator Johnson, why don't you give me the honor of you coming on this show and explain to me

1:51.5

what you learned from your hearing and what made it worthwhile and what you know about the election

1:56.4

that warrants what you just did? How is asking questions about whether the election was rigged when

2:01.8

you've said it wasn't significantly not dangerous? Doing it on TV would be dangerous. Let alone

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from CNN, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of CNN and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.