All right. Thank you very much, Ross, for those comments and thanks to all the speakers.

It's my job to sort of run the panel.

And I'll make a couple quick observations and that other people can, we can have some give and take.

I want to say that at Crayton University, where I

taught for 20 years from 1990 to 2010, I often had students in my freshman class who were surprised

to discover that Crate was a Catholic university. You mean this is a religious school? So this

is to reinforce the point that I think it's absolutely correct.

And I would say also that it's clear, I think it's quite right that multiculturalism,

political correctness, whatever we want to call the sort of fevered political utopianism is clearly an Erzat's first philosophy for the university.

I saw this as a professor where we wanted to have diversity across the curriculum.

And that's precisely the idea, right? Your first philosophy

provides a rationale for the whole. It provides some account of what the university is trying to,

what the end that it seeks. And so at a Catholic institution that had pretty good, pretty strong

core curriculum, but even there, the tendency was to reach towards political,

it was a sought political practice, by no means was it toxic,

but there was a tendency to go to some political project,

moral political project as the first philosophy

for the university. And I would suggest that this is actually progressive Protestantism

in its secular form that I don't think Yale and Harvard have changed much at all religiously

over the last 150 years, and that they were, in their own way, institutions that shifted Christianity

from a kind of transcendent concern, which were

people, elites were having more and more difficulty believing that Jesus rose from the dead

...