4.8 • 729 Ratings
🗓️ 10 October 2022
⏱️ 61 minutes
🧾️ Download transcript
This talk was given on July 16, 2022 at the Fourth Annual Thomistic Philosophy and Natural Science Symposium For more information please visit thomisticinstitute.org. About the speaker: MARIUSZ TABACZEK, O.P., is a Polish Dominican and theologian. He holds Ph.D. in philosophical theology from the Graduate Theological Union in Berkeley, CA and Church Licentiate from the Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznan, Poland. After his studies at the GTU and a fellowship at the Notre Dame Institute for Advanced Studies he returned to Poland. For three years he worked as a researcher at the Thomistic Institute in Warsaw (Poland), a lecturer at the Pontifical Faculty of Theology in Warsaw and the Dominican School of Philosophy and Theology in Krakow, and a director of Studium Dominicanum in Warsaw. He then moved to Rome where he became a professor of theology at the Pontifical University of Saint Thomas Aquinas. He is also a researcher at the Thomistic Institute at the same University. One of the hallmarks of modern science is the ability to explain the workings of nature by detailed study of its pieces and parts. Organisms are understood as combinations of organ systems, which are made up of tissues, which are made up of cells, which are made of up complex chemicals, then atoms, and more fundamental particles. As successful as this methodological reductionism has been, it is still an open question how complete it can be. Can everything about complex biological systems be reduced to chemistry, and every detail of chemistry explained from fundamental physics? Do the organization and complexity of higher-level systems require additional tools to complete our understanding of the natural world? Do the answers to these scientific questions work for or against an Aristotelian and Thomistic understanding of nature and natural kinds, and how might those classical ideas be of use in contemporary science? The Thomistic Philosophy and Natural Science Symposium gathers expert scientists and philosophers to discuss the potential compatibility and mutual enrichment of the study of Aquinas' philosophy of nature and various forms of modern scientific knowledge in mathematics, physics, chemistry, and biology. The 2022 symposium included a day of lectures geared towards an introduction to Thomistic philosophy and the history of science, with a focus on complexity, simplicity and emergence. The rest of the symposium will have scientific experts discussing the understanding of complexity and simplicity in their own fields with one another and with philosophers.
Click on a timestamp to play from that location
0:00.0 | This talk is brought to you by the Tamistic Institute. |
0:03.3 | For more talks like this, visit us at tamistic institute.org. |
0:11.1 | The very term emergence was introduced or reinvented by philosophers. |
0:17.2 | And then some of the scientists like, some other dislike it. |
0:21.6 | But then the difficult task that philosophers have after reintroducing this term is to make sense of what is being made of this term by others. |
0:30.6 | Because philosophy is this branch of knowledge where we try to provide more, most general definitions. |
0:38.3 | So in what I would present here, so what I would have here or present here, it will be, |
0:45.7 | I will try to show how difficult it is for philosophers of science. |
0:50.2 | I will speak from the point of view of more contemporary analytic metaphysics, |
0:53.8 | how difficult is to provide a unified and univocal definition of emergence and what are the difficulties that we encounter on the way. |
1:04.5 | And then I will also try to show how the categories that are important for us, classical philosophers and more philosophers |
1:14.6 | than theologians, those categories that were mentioned by Father Thomas on the first day, |
1:19.5 | how they actually re-entered the conversation today precisely in this context of the theory |
1:26.0 | of emergence and what are difficulties and complexities |
1:29.6 | of this return to those classical terms. |
1:34.5 | So first emergence, the simple definition that analytic philosophy provides an example of a |
1:43.0 | definition would be this. |
1:44.8 | Emergence denotes a wide variety of phenomena where new processes, interactions, |
1:50.2 | entities and properties are claimed to be observed, characteristic for higher levels of complexity |
1:54.8 | of matter and irreducible to their lower level constituents. |
1:59.2 | Note that from the beginning we can see the great difficulty that is out there. |
2:05.0 | What are emergence? |
... |
Please login to see the full transcript.
Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from The Thomistic Institute, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.
Generated transcripts are the property of The Thomistic Institute and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.
Copyright © Tapesearch 2025.