You're not going to be here. As you read the doctrine and covenants, section 10 seems out of place chronologically.

Since it talks about Martin Harris and the translation of the 116 pages,

shouldn't it come after section 3?

What happened?

We'll tell you today.

Welcome, my dear friends, to Meridian magazines, Come Follow Me, podcast.

We are Scott and Maureen Proctor, and I want to thank you personally for your prayers and well wishes while I have been in the hospital with COVID. I am not entirely better yet, as you can hear in my voice, but I can talk, eat drink and that is a major breakthrough and being generous I

also shared COVID with Maureen. Thank you Scott and I'm doing much better with it than you are.

So isn't it good that we aren't talking to you in person?

Our lesson today is Doctrine and Covenants, sections 10 and 11, that you may come off conqueror.

The reason section 10 is not right after section 3 is that there has been some confusion in the

past about the date the revelation was received.

Originally, the date of Section 10 was listed as May 1829, putting it in between the dates

for Section 9 and 11.

Yet the Prophet Joseph himself said section 10

was the first revelation he received immediately after the plates

will return to him on the 22nd of September, 1828.

When B.H. Roberts and the committee put together the 1921 edition of the Doctrine and Covenants, they recognized that previous The

1921 edition of the Doctrine and Covenants, they recognized that previous editions were based on a date

miscalculation, but they left it as it was. The section should go,

section 3, section 10, and then section 4.

Though we've talked about Oliver Cowdry,

...