meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
EconTalk

Clifford Winston on Lawyers

EconTalk

Library of Economics and Liberty

Ethics, Philosophy, Economics, Books, Science, Business, Courses, Social Sciences, Society & Culture, Interviews, Education, History

4.74.3K Ratings

🗓️ 5 September 2011

⏱️ 62 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

Clifford Winston of the Brookings Institution talks with EconTalk host Russ Roberts about the market for lawyers and the role of lawyers in the political process. Drawing on a new co-authored book, First Thing We Do, Let's Deregulate All the Lawyers, Winston argues that restrictions on the supply of lawyers and increases in demand via government regulation artificially boost lawyers' salaries. Deregulation of the supply (by eliminating licensing) would lower price and encourage innovation.

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

Welcome to Econ Talk, part of the Library of Economics and Liberty. I'm your host Russ Roberts

0:13.9

of George Mason University and Stanford University's Hoover Institution. Our website is econtalk.org

0:21.3

where you can subscribe, find other episodes, comment on this podcast, and find links to

0:26.5

another information related to today's conversation. Our email address is mailadicontalk.org. We'd

0:33.6

love to hear from you.

0:35.6

Today is September 1st, 2011, and my guest is Cliff Winston, Senior Fellow at the Brookings

0:44.0

Institution. His latest book, Co-Arthur with Robert Crandall and Vic from Maheshry, is,

0:49.6

first thing we do, let's deregulate all the lawyers. Cliff, welcome back to Econ Talk.

0:55.7

Thanks, good to be here again.

0:57.7

Now, the title of the book is a takeoff on Shakespeare Henry VI, part two. First thing we do,

1:03.7

let's kill all the lawyers. You have a much more modest proposal, which is to deregulate all

1:10.5

the lawyers. And essentially, in the book, you make the shocking claim, I think shocking to many,

1:16.2

that America has too few lawyers. Why is that?

1:21.2

Well, again, I want to be a little careful here. I'm not sure whether it has too few or too many.

1:29.2

There has been a debate about that. I think our position is, whatever the number, we have too few of them competing

1:37.2

as intensely as they could be, and probably too many that are getting paid very, very high wages.

1:45.2

And that with competition, we would, those kinds of premiums fall. Now, in the end, whether we're going to have more or less,

1:54.2

it's not really so much the focus of the book, as much as the competitive changes that we'd like to see.

2:00.2

But at this point, I probably speculate that we may have more, but that's something we can get into a bit later.

2:06.2

So, what's the evidence? Why do you make the claim that there's an adequate competition? What's holding it back?

2:13.2

Well, let's first start with the institutional setting, and there are interesting things here that are different from other markets that appear to have these features.

2:23.2

The key part about lawyers that we call occupational licensing, that is presumably for reasons of information quality that people can't really tell in advance

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Library of Economics and Liberty, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of Library of Economics and Liberty and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2025.