Clarence Thomas Loves Killing Potentially Innocent Men

Opening Arguments

Opening Arguments Media LLC

Atheist, Opinion, Harvard, News, Politics, Legal, Law, Liberal, Supremecourt

4.3 • 3.7K Ratings

🗓️ 18 October 2024

⏱️ 49 minutes

🔗️ Recording | iTunes | RSS

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

OA1078 - The Supreme Court is back from their vacation and is set to ruin a bunch of lives again! They start off with Glossip v. Oklahoma, another opportunity for the Republican ghouls on the Court to execute a potentially innocent man.

But not to worry, Matt's Footnote Fetish(tm) will bring us wayyyy back into happy territory, as a favorite character from OA past is in the news in the best way!

Check out the OA Linktree for all the places to go and things to do!

If you’d like to support the show (and lose the ads!), please pledge at patreon.com/law!

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0	So just a yes or no you still do not have a plan? I have concepts of a plan. That is a damning non-answer. I'm not trying to...
0:15.0	That is a damning non-answer.
0:20.0	I'm not trying to make it about myself, your honor.
0:27.1	I'm just trying to show his bias toward the defendant.
0:30.5	Just don't make it about yourself. Something simple as a crack pipe, a use crack pipe.
0:37.0	The rules were that you got to
0:40.0	going to fact check. Hello and welcome to opening arguments.
0:47.0	This is episode 1,078.
0:49.0	I'm your host Thomas Smith and with me as always is real life attorney Matt Cameron how you doing
0:54.5	Matt not too bad considering that we're looking today at the case which
0:57.7	abolitionists should hold up for all time as the example of why we can't allow the
1:00.9	state to kill people, otherwise doing okay.
1:02.6	Yeah, funny jokes, I don't know.
1:05.3	Yeah, no joke, no opening joke on this one.
1:08.0	Yeah, the only joke is the Supreme Court.
1:10.7	How about that?
1:11.2	Does that work? Just about a couple of members of the Supreme Court, how about that? Does that work? Is that good?
1:12.9	Just about a couple of members of the Supreme Court at least.
1:15.0	Yeah, yeah.
1:16.4	Even though this one is a bit of a bummer,
1:18.8	we've got the footnote to bring us back.
1:20.3	We've got a footnote featuring one of our favorite OA characters.
	...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Previous episode | Next episode

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Opening Arguments Media LLC, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of Opening Arguments Media LLC and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.