W-W-P-H-D W-O-G-L-H-D-D-D-D-D-D-D-D-D-D-D-D-D-D-D-D-D-D-D-D-D-D-D-D-D-D-D-D-D-D-D-D-D-D-D-D-D-D-D-D-D-D-D-D-D-D-D-D-D-D-D-D-D-D-D-D-D-D-D-D-D-D-D-D-D-D-D-D-D-D-D-D-D-D-D-D-D-D-D-D-D-D-D-D-D-D-D-D-D-D-D-D-D-D-D-D-D-D-D-D-D-D-

They are the Oversight Committee Chairman James Cormor making that announcement today and the FBI under scrutiny after they targeted Catholics. Welcome back to the show. Glanger here today is our fourth and final hour, 855-839-1210 on Twitter at Rich. It's the only so much to get to. It's been quite a show today. I just want to follow up on our last conversation just to tie a bow on it as we say that officially on at our Kate May live broadcast on

Friday, September 1st, the game will be called pin the rug on the Murphy. And again, that's thanks to Michael Pellka for that. So it'll be his Royal Ruggness King Philip the

Unaccountable and we will play pin the rug on the Murphy as soon as I get my carpet samples from

Forcelini carpet and flooring. And we'll bring him to the Grand Hotel. And if you can pin the rug on the Murphy, you might get a beer. I

can't we cannot at Odyssey encourage drinking or anything like that, but it's very possible. So all right, so Mark

Accounter for September 1st. It's gonna be great. It's Royal Ruggness. All right, 855-839-1210. You know, I have I have talked a lot over the years

about civil asset forfeiture. There is a woman who her name is Crystal Starling. She lost $8,000 after she missed one of her several

filing deadlines to contests the seizure of her money by police. A federal appeals court says she and others like her should be given more leeway.

To this day, the government is still out to steal your money. TSA is now searching through cell phones. Our government now is doing more and more to spy

on us than just outright rob us. And there is this in Rochester, New York police rated the apartment of a woman named Crystal Starling. And she lost $8,000 to the United States government because of a

missed deadline despite never being charged with a crime. Last week, some hope as a federal appeals court revived her case. My my prayer here is that this will go to

the Supreme Court. Clarence Thomas will write the majority opinion over turning this concept of civil asset forfeiture. Let me explain what it is. In case you I mean, you know, you're a smart person. You'll send

the show. But under criminal forfeiture, you've been found guilty by a jury. You've had your due process. And then at that point, the government can take whatever they can take under the law. So that means if you're drugged

or they found you guilty of something and your car was used in the course of the crime, then the government has the right to seize it if that's on the books. And I'm not

contesting any of that. My issue is when you've done nothing wrong, you haven't even been charged with a crime. But even if you are charged with a crime, you have not been found guilty by a

jury of your peers. And yet they steal your stuff. That is completely antithetical to the fourth amendment completely antithetical. By the way, speaking of drug dealers, the United States Supreme Court has paused the Purdue

form a bankruptcy deal. This came out a short time ago. If you remember years ago, I talked about the show dope sick on Hulu. They were actually one of my

sponsors, great show about oxy cotton and the Purdue family and how the Purdue family was behind that drug. Well, in the settlement that the government had come up with with

Purdue pharma, it was a $6 billion deal. But it would have taken away any members of the sackler family from any opioid related lawsuits or claims. So the court slated arguments in the case for

December, leading to a decision likely early next year, the stay will remain in place until the decision is handed down, Purdue, the maker of oxy cotton file for bankruptcy in 2019, an attempt to settle about 3,000 lawsuits from states, tribes and other local entities related to its

aggressive opioid marketing. And that, of course, they say the opioid crisis has killed nearly 500,000 people over the past 20 years. I don't agree with all the reforms that have been made in the opioid, the wake of the opioid crisis. I think they've tied a lot of doctor's hands. I think there are a lot of people out there in legitimate pain who can't get the medication that they need. But the point is that the the sacklers owned Purdue, Purdue is behind this now, Purdue pharma separate from the sackler family. But the question of liability and all this because they knowing

...