4.6 • 1.7K Ratings
🗓️ 9 December 2022
⏱️ 42 minutes
🧾️ Download transcript
The Supreme Court considered a case this week that could upend the way America conducts elections. Moore v Harper brings to the national stage a once-fringe legal theory that state lawmakers enjoy near-absolute authority over federal elections. What impact could the case have? And, with the final race in the midterms now complete, how healthy does democracy in America look?
The Economist’s Supreme Court correspondent Steve Mazie recaps the arguments before the court. The Economist’s Ann Wroe remembers the time the Supreme Court decided an election. And Harvard’s Nicholas Stephanopoulos assesses the state of America’s democracy.
John Prideaux hosts with Charlotte Howard and Idrees Kahloon.
We are always trying to improve our podcasts for our listeners. To help, please complete this short survey: economist.com/uspodsurvey
You can now find every episode of Checks and Balance in one place and sign up to our weekly newsletter. For full access to print, digital and audio editions, as well as exclusive live events, subscribe to The Economist at economist.com/uspod.
Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Click on a timestamp to play from that location
0:00.0 | They were odd outfits. |
0:05.6 | The young people wore typical business attire of bland shirts and chinos, but paired with |
0:10.9 | bright fluorescent running shoes. |
0:13.9 | At the Supreme Court, news interns had to be prepared to sprint. |
0:18.9 | Recording devices aren't allowed in America's highest court, so getting landmark rulings |
0:23.1 | on air as quickly as possible often came down to a test of speed and agility. |
0:29.7 | Inside the building, just as a justice began reading a decision, interns were handed |
0:34.3 | printed copies. |
0:35.8 | They sprinted them across the plaza of the Supreme Court to deliver them to anchors |
0:39.9 | waiting on the marble steps. |
0:42.4 | For big decisions, whoever ran fastest could break it first. |
0:47.1 | It was christened the running of the interns. |
0:51.2 | Since the pandemic, opinions have instead been released online. |
0:54.8 | The interns can hang up their sneakers. |
0:57.8 | Yet health precautions have also prompted the court to live stream arguments for the |
1:01.1 | first time, and it's kept the stream even as the courtroom has reopened to the public. |
1:06.9 | The Supreme Court is therefore more accessible than ever, even as the majority of Americans |
1:12.0 | say it is out of touch. |
1:14.7 | But as the court democratises a bit, it's turning its focus towards the structure of |
1:19.6 | democracy. |
1:20.6 | I'm John Prado and this is Chex and Balance from the Economist. |
1:27.7 | Each week we take one big theme, shaping American politics, and explore it in depth. |
... |
Please login to see the full transcript.
Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from The Economist, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.
Generated transcripts are the property of The Economist and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.
Copyright © Tapesearch 2025.