Welcome to Pretty Wise and Alibiz. Let's seek the truth and travel the long road to justice together.

What you know, alabires? Welcome to another episode of Pretty Lies and alabies.

I'm Gee, not on camera today because I'm going to be honest,

I didn't feel like putting makeup on we are going to catch up on some filings in Charlie Adelson and Donna's case

We're gonna jump right in his appellate attorneys have replied to the state's response to appellate's

motion to relinquish jurisdiction to the trial court.

Just an FYI, you're going to hear Giglio and Brady in the filing.

So what are these these Brady violation is violating due process by not

disclosing exculpatory evidence failing to do so violates due process if you followed the Alec Baldwin trial for the

rust onset shooting his case was dismissed due to a Brady violation and

a Giglio is the prosecution is obligated to disclose all information or materials that may be used to impeach the credibility of prosecution witnesses.

So let's read this filing. It says simply put, it is better to address this issue now because

the conflict claim was just considered by the trial court in Donna's case.

In a footnote, it says it's better to have Judge Everett consider this issue now, then risk the possibility

of a different judge having to consider this issue in the future. Otherwise this conflict issue will

continue to cloud Charlie's case for many months or years to come.

Notably there's no harm to the state if the issue is considered now.

The footnote says that if the court relinquishes jurisdiction to the trial court,

the state would be permitted to raise all of the arguments set forth in their response,

and both parties would get finality on the issue.

It's in the interests of both justice and judicial economy for the issue to be considered now.

The procedure articulated by the Florida Supreme Court in State v. Menesis allows relinquishment

...