Chapter 4.10 - December 29th Meeting (The January 6th Report)
Government Unfiltered
Dan Williams
4.8 • 993 Ratings
🗓️ 28 February 2023
⏱️ 6 minutes
🧾️ Download transcript
Summary
In a meeting on December 29th, senior DOJ officials were presented with a draft civil complain tentatively called United States v. Pennsylvania. The DOJ looked at the lawsuit and determined they could not file it for multiple reasons. One primary reason was the proposed lawsuit lacked merit. This chapter also brings up a new allegation of a conspiracy involving an Italian company that was involved in changing votes in the Presidential election.
These episodes are created based on the value-for-value model - if you find value in the effort to provide an open and available reading of this document, please support the podcast at governmentunfiltered.com or patreon.com/timberlanemedia. If you'd like to provide an anonymous donation, you can go to glow.fm/insider. Follow the show on Twitter @GovUnfiltered or on Facebook at facebook.com/governmentunfiltered.
Transcript
Click on a timestamp to play from that location
| 0:00.0 | This is a reading of the December 22nd, 2022 final report from the select committee to investigate the January 6th attack on the United |
| 0:16.2 | States Capitol. |
| 0:18.4 | Chapter 4 Just Call it Corrupt and Leave the rest to me. |
| 0:23.0 | 4.10. |
| 0:28.0 | December 29th Meeting |
| 0:31.0 | The next day, Rosen, Donahue, and Engel had a meeting with Mark Meadows, Pat Cipolloni, and |
| 0:37.0 | Cipollone's deputy Pat Filbin in the White House Chief of Staff's office. |
| 0:42.0 | While the meeting dealt primarily with the presidential |
| 0:44.0 | transition, the group discussed a civil complaint modeled after Texas v. |
| 0:48.5 | Pennsylvania that the President wanted the Department of Justice to file, |
| 0:52.0 | challenging the results of the presidential election, |
| 0:55.0 | tentatively called United States v Pennsylvania. |
| 1:00.0 | The DOJ officials said that they had not had time to thoroughly review the proposed |
| 1:04.4 | suit, but initially indicated that it appeared to be flawed and did not seem viable for DOJ to |
| 1:11.0 | file. Meadows suggested that the DOJ leadership meet with |
| 1:15.4 | William Olson and Kurt Olson, the two attorneys affiliated with the Trump |
| 1:19.8 | campaign that had been working on the proposed suit and added that Eastman and had been working on the proposed suit and added that Eastman and a retired judge from North Carolina named Mark Martin both had views about the lawsuit. |
| 1:31.0 | In this meeting Meadows also raised a new and outrageous allegation of election fraud, |
| 1:37.0 | that an Italian company had been involved in changing votes in the presidential election. |
| 1:42.0 | According to Meadows, there was a man votes in the presidential election. |
| 1:43.0 | According to Meadows, there was a man, whom Donahue later learned was in an Italian |
| 1:48.4 | prison, who claimed to have information supporting the allegation, and that CIA officers stationed in Rome |
... |
Please login to see the full transcript.
Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Dan Williams, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.
Generated transcripts are the property of Dan Williams and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.
Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.