Ladies and gentlemen of the interwebs, in today's moment of, isn't that ironic, don't you think,

the crowd of the person who is being allegedly attacked for just asking questions and

are defending her right to just ask questions, my goodness, do they seem to get mad at anybody

who they perceive to be criticizing her for just asking questions?

This is Candace Irwin's on Pierce Morgan yesterday.

And the prediction that Viva made that I believe has come to fruition to some extent, all seems more likely than not.

But enjoy this exchange.

And then we shall just ask questions.

Behold.

Why would he say that?

So I want to-

I want to-

I want to get-

Candice, I want to get to the reality of what you're actually saying.

So when you say that somebody at Turning Point USA, Charlie's company, was complicit in his murder.

Who? Who was?

In a cover-up of what happened to Charlie on that day.

No, but who was involved in his murder?

I didn't say that they murdered Charlie.

You said that people at Turning Point were complicit in his murder?

No, my exact sentence that I said was that there were people at Turning Point who are engaged in a cover-up. No, you didn't. Sorry, you didn't. Thoroughly. Caddice, you didn't say that. You said literally, they were- You said there were people at Turning Point complicit in his murder. Okay. That's what you said. When you and I were discussing, that's why I said, let's go back. I was applying the logic of a conspiracy to JFK. I said, okay, JFK, you have people that are complicit. Of course, if you apply that logic, if there is a conspiracy, there's going to be multiple people that are going to be complicit by the time in order for a large stage murder happen. You specifically said, you didn't say complicit in a cover-up. You said

complicit in the murder. Because I said who in turning point was involved in his murder.

...