meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
More or Less: Behind the Stats

Can we use maths to beat the robots?

More or Less: Behind the Stats

BBC

Business, Mathematics, Science, News Commentary, News

4.63.5K Ratings

🗓️ 3 September 2022

⏱️ 9 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

Daily advances in the technology of artificial intelligence may leave humans playing catch-up – but in at least one area we can still retain an edge, mathematics. However it’ll require changes in how we think about and teach maths and we may still have to leave the simple adding up to the computers. Junaid Mubeen, author of Mathematical Intelligence, tells Tim Harford what it’ll take to stay ahead of the machines. Presenter: Tim Harford Producer: Jon Bithrey Sound Engineer: Rod Farquhar Production Coordinator: Jacqui Johnson Editor: Richard Vadon (Image: Digital generated image of artificial intelligence robot scanning the data: Getty / Andriy Onufriyenko)

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

Thank you for downloading the more or less podcast. We all weekly guide to the numbers

0:08.2

all around us in the news and in life. And I'm Tim Haafard.

0:15.2

Will machines eventually take over the world and beat humans at their own game? The question

0:20.9

isn't just a movie plot these days, there are daily advances in the technology of artificial

0:26.3

intelligence which should give everyone pause for thought.

0:31.4

But there is at least one area where we humans might retain an edge. Dr. Janne Mabine is a

0:37.5

British mathematician, turned educator and writer. He's just penned a new book called Mathematical

0:43.7

Intelligence. He thinks that humans can still beat computers in at least one field and it might

0:50.1

surprise you. It's maths. Sure, computers are fabulous at adding stuff up but Janne Mabine says

0:57.4

there's a lot more to maths than that. You say in the book that machines are not as good at maths

1:08.5

as humans which I think is a surprising statement to a lot of people. It's that because we don't

1:16.4

really understand computers or is it because we don't really understand maths. Maybe a bit of both.

1:21.4

So I guess we have to define our terms. What do we mean by maths here? Now I think the way many

1:26.8

people experience mathematics in terms of how they're taught at school, how it's portrayed in the

1:32.8

wider media, often is distilled into this bare calculational form. Everything comes down to

1:39.5

executing calculations and routine procedures and algorithms. In other words, the things that

1:45.9

computers can do very well. Once they crept past us, they just searched ahead and we have no hope

1:52.8

of competing with our silicon counterparts on those types of thinking skills. But the good

1:58.5

news is that if you ask a mathematician or a maths enthusiast, what their subject is really about,

2:04.4

they'll tell you that calculation has only ever really been a footnote. Of course it's part of

2:09.8

doing maths. There are numbers involved in mathematics. There are calculations but mathematics

2:15.3

really is a much more diverse and holistic thinking system than I think many people realise and

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from BBC, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of BBC and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2025.