Can States Prohibit Social Media Platforms From Censoring Opposing Viewpoints? The Supreme Court Just Heard Oral Arguments and Here's How The Justices Are Feeling. Plus More.

UNBIASED Politics

Jordan Berman

Education

4.8 • 2.5K Ratings

🗓️ 27 February 2024

⏱️ 26 minutes

🔗️ Recording | iTunes | RSS

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

1. DEEP DIVE: Supreme Court to Decide Whether States Can Ban Social Media Censorship of Opposing Viewpoints (1:08)2. QUICK HITTERS: Air Force Member Sets Self on Fire Outside Israel Embassy in DC (18:54); Republican National Committee Chair and Co-Chair to Step Down Following South Carolina Primary (19:56); Donald Trump Wins South Carolina Primary, Super PAC Pulls Funding From Haley (21:46); FTC Sues to Block $25B Kroger/Albertsons Merger (22:57); United States Will Soon Lose Communication with Private Moon Lander (24:21); Trump and Co-Defendants Appeal Engoron's NYC Judgment (25:15)If you enjoyed this episode, please leave me a review and share it with those you know that also appreciate unbiased news!Watch this episode on YouTube.Follow Jordan on Instagram and TikTok.All sources for this episode can be found here. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0	Welcome back to UnBias, your favorite source of UnBias News and Legal Analysis.
0:08.0	I'm your host, Jordan, and I hope you enjoy the show.
0:12.0	Welcome back to UnBias. and I hope you enjoy the show.
0:15.0	Welcome back to UnBias. Today is Tuesday, February 27, 2024.
0:18.0	This episode was recorded yesterday around 5 p.m. Eastern time.
0:21.0	In today's episode, we're first going to take a deep dive into the oral arguments that were
0:26.4	presented to the Supreme Court yesterday in two cases dealing with censorship on social media and state regulation.
0:35.2	And then we'll move on to and finish with quick hitters,
0:39.2	so only two segments today.
0:40.9	And that'll be today's episode. Before we get into it, this is your reminder, that if you love
0:46.0	what you hear today and you feel smarter after listening, please go ahead and
0:50.6	leave me a review on whatever platform you listen on or if you are a
0:54.0	YouTube watcher hit that thumbs up button subscribe to the channel if you haven't
0:57.8	already all of those things really help support this platform so thank you so much in advance and without further
1:04.8	ado let's get into today's stories. On Monday the Supreme Court heard oral
1:11.1	arguments in two cases dealing with the constitutionality of laws which seek to
1:16.5	regulate how social media platforms regulate speech. One of the cases Net Net Choice versus Pakistan is out of Texas. The other Moody
1:26.0	versus Net Choice is out of Florida. So Net Choice is the organization
1:31.0	representing the tech companies.
1:33.4	Its stated mission is to make the internet safe
1:36.9	for free expression and free enterprise.
1:40.1	The case out of Texas is against Paxton because Ken Paxton is the attorney general of Texas,
	...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Previous episode | Next episode

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Jordan Berman, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of Jordan Berman and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.