What you know, alibiers, welcome to another episode of Pretty Lies and Alibis. I'm Gigi. It is Friday, January 24th.

Hope you guys are having a good morning so far. I actually recorded part one last night, but when I went to edit, found out my mic was on mute the entire time.

Threw my hands up, went to bed.

We're going to get this out today.

I'm going to split this into two separate episodes,

mainly because the motion for the Franks hearing was pretty lengthy,

and it was very interesting.

I didn't want to leave a lot out on that.

So look for the second episode at some point today.

Also, they're back in court this morning. I'll be live streaming. I'm not sure how much of today's hearing will actually be live streamed to us, but I'll

have the feed up for when they do come back. We're going to talk about the argument for the suppression

of the investigative genetic genealogy. They call that IGG, which throws me off because I'm GG, and it feels

really weird to say that, but what is the IGG process? It often starts when DNA found

that the scene of a crime doesn't yield results through standard law enforcement databases

like CODIS. They take certain parts of that DNA, which they call a SNIP,

and they run it into consumer DNA sites looking for possible relatives of the suspect DNA.

That is what the FBI did in this case, and then once they had a match,

they submit the results as a tip back to law enforcement.

So just a reminder, they found touch DNA belonging to Brian on the knife sheath, which was

found near one of the victims.

The defense goes on to say the court should suppress the IGG and everything that flows from

it.

...