Bryan Kohberger Fights For Transparency! Prosecution Wants Hearing Sealed.
The Emily Show
Baker Media, LLC.
4.9 • 1.9K Ratings
🗓️ 15 May 2024
⏱️ 60 minutes
🧾️ Download transcript
Summary
Head to https://factormeals.com/edb50 and use EDB50 to get 50% off your first box plus 20% off your next box!
Visit https://thrivecausemetics.com/LAWNERD for 10% off your first order.
Go to https://shopify.com/lawnerd now to grow your business – no matter what stage you’re in.
I broke down the Bryan Kohberger Hearing on May 2nd, 2024. The defense and prosecution agree that the hearing scheduled for May 16th, 2024 should be closed but do not agree that the hearing on May 14th, 2024 should also be closed.
Ann Taylor argues the hearing on May 14th should not be closed because it is in the interest of Kohberger's 6th Amendment Right to have a public trial. The prosecution argues that the proceedings before the public trial are not obligated to be in the public and that they need to balance the interests, privacy, and sensitive information as a right to a fair trial.
Judge John Judge ultimately sides with the prosecution to have a closed hearing on May 14th, 2024 signing a subpoena for the FBI to produce evidence for cell towers, amongst other things, that should have been provided over 6 months ago.
RESOURCES
Law Nerd TV: https://youtu.be/A7Qe944eA3A
This podcast uses the following third-party services for analysis:
Spotify Ad Analytics - https://www.spotify.com/us/legal/ad-analytics-privacy-policy/
Podscribe - https://podscribe.com/privacy
Chartable - https://chartable.com/privacy
Transcript
Click on a timestamp to play from that location
| 0:00.0 | Welcome back to this week's episode of the Emily Show. Today we are taking a look at the May 2nd hearing in Idaho. |
| 0:08.4 | So for those of you that listen on audio app, you will hear parts of that court hearing and me talking about parts of that |
| 0:14.4 | court hearing. What are we in court to decide today in Idaho? The state is |
| 0:19.7 | seeking to seal a number of upcoming hearings on motions to compel. |
| 0:25.0 | The defense is saying that this state is not turning over information |
| 0:29.0 | and some of that information was relied on in the probable cause affidavit and the state is |
| 0:33.4 | required to turn it over. The state is arguing that they have turned over what |
| 0:37.6 | they have, some things they aren't required to turn over and some things they |
| 0:41.7 | are fighting with the FBI to get and they need the court to sign |
| 0:45.5 | subpoenas to do that. So we are going to go through that hearing. I have clipped out the relevant |
| 0:51.7 | parts of argument from the prosecution, the defense, and the court's |
| 0:55.3 | rulings. If you want to see the full hearing, the full hearing without commentary will be linked |
| 1:02.2 | down below. |
| 1:03.2 | We saved that on our Laundered TV channel, |
| 1:05.6 | so you can watch it. |
| 1:06.7 | And the hearing as I recorded this episode |
| 1:09.0 | with commentary is available for the members. |
| 1:11.9 | So let's get in to today's episode. |
| 1:13.7 | Welcome to the Emily Show. |
| 1:15.8 | I'm Emily D Baker, the Internet's go-to legal analyst |
| 1:18.9 | and big fan of the Cursey Awards. |
| 1:20.6 | I've been a licensed attorney for over 17 years. I'm a former prosecutor and I |
... |
Please login to see the full transcript.
Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Baker Media, LLC., and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.
Generated transcripts are the property of Baker Media, LLC. and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.
Copyright © Tapesearch 2025.