So our current and soon to be ex-mayor announced today job cuts and a slash of his climate budget in half

because of his continued fiscal irresponsibility. Now, this would normally be a surprise,

but why should we be surprised

that a career politician who's never run a business

in his life could actually be fiscally responsible with the city?

And now, over the next two years,

the Greater London Authority is expected to lose 493 million pounds due to his leadership.

And these cuts are reportedly just a drop in the bucket.

Now, if this was a one-off case, maybe we could cut him some slack, but it's not.

Because this is a serial case of fiscal irresponsibility. Let's take

transport for London. 9.56 billion pounds he has lost over the past four years. It's gone bust

twice now and he goes cap in hand to the government asking and demanding bailouts from them.

And another 30 billion pounds, he recently asked for the bulk of that to cover his failings

when it comes to building housing that this city desperately needs.

And that's the problem we have, again again with a career politician with his vested interest

because he doesn't know how important it is to balance a budget now i'm in the business world

and where i come from you either balance your budget or you get eliminated that's how it works

but in his world if you don, they just tax the citizens.

Or he goes and complains to the national government

and asks for billions and billions of pounds

to bail out the city because he knows they will.

So he never intends to run this fiscally responsible.

...