We are 24 hours away from a total lockdown

in the country of Great Britain.

Total lockdown.

And let me say this right up front.

If there was data to suggest that this was an intelligent move,

if this was a proportionate response to the virus

that was based in science, I would be the first one

locking down. I would be a proponent, but it's not.

This was a knee-jerk decision made by our prime minister

on Saturday because of a study, one study.

And let's dive into that study. It was done by Cambridge

University in Public Health England. And that study predicted 4,000 COVID-related deaths per day in the

coming months unless something was done. But that same study also predicted 1,000 deaths per day

right now, right now.

Now I ran the numbers from October 22nd to October 28th,

an average of 182 people died in this country

from COVID-related deaths.

That is one-fifth of what this model is predicting. One-fifth, the same model that we're

using to shut the entire country down that is predicting 4,000 deaths per day. So why are we making

decisions based on a model that's already been proven to be flawed. The data doesn't match up.

This model started calculations three weeks ago,

and we are proving today

...