meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
Sekulow

BREAKING: SCOTUS Decision Could Demolish Jack Smith’s Case Against Trump

Sekulow

Jay Sekulow

Christianity, Government, Religion & Spirituality

4.51.4K Ratings

🗓️ 16 April 2024

⏱️ 50 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

Today the U.S. Supreme Court is hearing oral arguments on whether Jan. 6 protestors at the U.S. Capitol can be charged with obstructing an official proceeding. The pending ruling will impact Special Counsel Jack Smith's election interference case against President Donald Trump because the former President faces the same charge. Also, NBC News reports that Israel's retaliatory response to Iran's drone attack could be "imminent." The Sekulow team discusses Trump's Supreme Court case, Israel's possible military response to Iran, House Republicans looking to enforce stricter sanctions on Iran – and much more.

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

Today on Secular the Supreme Court here's a case that could do major damage to

0:05.6

jacksmith's charges against Trump as Israel sets its sights on Iran.

0:11.3

Keeping you informed and engaged.

0:15.0

Now more than ever.

0:16.0

This is Seculo.

0:20.0

We want to hear from you.

0:21.0

Share and post your comments for call 1-800 684 3110.

0:29.6

And now your host Jordan Secular.

0:32.0

All right, the case today is Fisher versus Department of Justice.

0:36.4

And again, this is a case which could have serious implications on Jack Smith's case

0:42.3

against President Trump out of Washington, D.C.

0:45.0

So Fisher versus the United States.

0:47.0

Fisher was one of the people who did enter the Capitol.

0:50.0

He was charged with a number of crimes, seven different counts, but he is challenging one of those counts, and that is obstruction of official proceeding under section 18 of the U.S. Code 1512. And that's because there's a debate that goes back and forth

1:06.2

between even courts now the district court which agreed with Fisher the

1:11.0

appellate court which did not,

1:12.8

which said that when you're talking about that code provision,

1:15.8

that criminal code provision,

1:17.2

you're actually talking about tampering with evidence.

1:20.6

You're not talking about tampering with a actual procedure, like they had to, you know,

1:27.0

slow down to have their procedural vote on the Electoral College counting.

1:31.6

You're actually talking about tampering with evidence and

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Jay Sekulow, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of Jay Sekulow and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.