meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
The Thomistic Institute

Born Broken? Aquinas On Original Sin | Fr. Gregory Pine, O.P.

The Thomistic Institute

The Thomistic Institute

Christianity, Society & Culture, Catholic Intellectual Tradition, Catholic, Philosophy, Religion & Spirituality, Thomism, Catholicism

4.8729 Ratings

🗓️ 8 July 2020

⏱️ 60 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

This talk was livestreamed from the Dominican House of Studies in Washington, D.C., as part of the Thomistic Institute's Quarantine Lecture series.


For more information on the Quarantine Lectures and to subscribe, visit us online: thomisticinstitute.org/quarantine-lectures.

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

What does it mean to say that one is born into original sin? For us, this poses a very significant

0:06.2

theological problem, a hurdle in explaining how the Catholic faith is coherent and that it has

0:11.8

reasons to marshal in its defense. Just at the outset, quite a few conundra arise. Are we to say

0:18.8

that we are born broken, that we are born bad, that we are born bent? And what

0:24.6

sense is that a coherent claim, and what does that say about a good God who so fashioned us? We could also

0:30.5

ask, how is it that we can sin inevitably while still being held responsible? It seems as if we are caught in the trap of human nature

0:39.3

from which we cannot hope to escape by our own resources.

0:43.3

Such seems a terrible fate.

0:46.3

We can ask further, how can guilt, which again seems a moral characteristic,

0:51.3

be inheritable, which seems like a natural feature.

0:56.0

So, at the heart of this mystery, there are a lot of different features that require explanation,

1:02.0

and though we cannot probe the depths of them, we can at least begin to inquire as to how the mystery itself is not irrational,

1:10.0

or how the mystery can give reasons in its defense,

1:13.6

martial in its defense, and how it can further illumine the human condition.

1:17.6

So let's just begin with a small point then about scriptural exegesis.

1:21.6

Some of us will kind of be inclined to say that original sin is very patent there in the scriptures.

1:26.6

It seems undeniable.

1:28.1

So how could people have objections to it? Well, we just begin by noting that Genesis 3,

1:34.6

the famous passage there, the sin described in Genesis 3, 5, and the fallout described

1:39.6

in the rest of the chapter, is not, well, it's not to say that that is the only way by which to read the text.

1:46.8

So, for instance, if we consult the Jewish interpretation of the scripture, there are a wide

1:51.4

variety of ways in which to kind of identify what precisely transpires in this event, and it's not

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from The Thomistic Institute, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of The Thomistic Institute and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2025.