meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
Conspirituality

Bonus Sample: Did We Choose to Be the Good Ones?

Conspirituality

Derek Beres, Matthew Remski, Julian Walker

Spirituality, Social Sciences, Religion & Spirituality, Science, Philosophy, Society & Culture

4.22K Ratings

🗓️ 29 November 2021

⏱️ 9 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

Kyle Rittenhouse walks away from the courthouse while Ahmaud Arbery's killers were found guilty and "QAnon Shaman," Jacob Chansley, was received significant jail time. Our opinions on each of these cases are likely determined by our political affiliations, which in turn are a reflection of how we think about morality, crime, and punishment.Julian draws on scientific research into how genetics and the brain shape our politics, thought experiments in moral philosophy, and the work of moral psychologist Jonathan Haidt.As he questions whether or not any of us have freely chosen to be the good ones, he wonders if a way out of our toxic polarization might be found through understanding the underlying moral values and emotional reactions that drive one another's political beliefs. -- -- --Support us on PatreonPre-order Conspirituality: How New Age Conspiracy Theories Became a Health Threat: America | Canada Follow us on Instagram | Twitter: Derek | Matthew | JulianOriginal music by EarthRise SoundSystem Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

Hello, Matthew here from the Conspirituality Podcast Team.

0:06.6

The following is a sample of the bonus episode we produce every week for our Patreon subscribers.

0:12.9

You can support our work and have full access to bonus episodes and other premium content

0:17.7

by subscribing for as little as $5 a month at patreon.com slash Conspirituality.

0:25.1

Thanks for listening and your support, which keeps us ad-free and editorially independent.

0:32.0

A 2014 study published in Behavior Genetics looked at a sample of over 12,000 twin pairs

0:40.2

from five different countries over the course of four decades.

0:44.2

They found that political attitudes are roughly 40% genetic.

0:50.7

Epidemiologist Peter Hattemi, the lead author of the study, said,

0:55.3

we inherit part of how we process information, how we see the world, and how we perceive threats.

1:02.8

And these are expressed in modern societies as political attitudes.

1:08.5

A different study in 2015 published in the Proceedings of the Royal Society, B,

1:13.8

showed that 62% of highly liberal women carried dopamine receptor genotypes

1:20.9

that have been associated with extraversion and novelty seeking.

1:25.6

Only 37%, so slightly more than half, of women in this study with conservative attitudes,

1:32.7

carried those particular genes.

1:38.3

Molecular geneticist Richard Ebbstein, who's the lead author of that study,

1:43.3

speculated that perhaps high novelty seekers are more willing to entertain the idea of change,

1:51.0

including in the political sphere.

1:54.7

These findings line up with other psychological research that shows how openness to new experience

2:02.2

as a personality trait is predictive of liberal political beliefs,

2:07.8

while trait conscientiousness tends to correlate with being more conservative.

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Derek Beres, Matthew Remski, Julian Walker, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of Derek Beres, Matthew Remski, Julian Walker and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2025.