4.2 • 2K Ratings
🗓️ 17 March 2025
⏱️ 5 minutes
🔗️ Recording | iTunes | RSS
🧾️ Download transcript
Click on a timestamp to play from that location
0:00.0 | Hey everyone, welcome to Conspiratuality, where we investigate the intersection of conspiracy theories and spiritual influence to uncover cults, pseudoscience, and authoritarian extremism. |
0:12.7 | I'm Matthew Remski. We are on Instagram and threads at Conspiruality Pod, and you can access all of our episodes ad-free, plus our Monday bonus episodes on Patreon |
0:21.8 | or just our bonus episodes via Apple subscriptions. |
0:25.2 | So this is a bonus episode. |
0:27.2 | It's called Anti-Fascist Woodshed 2.1, |
0:30.2 | punching Nazis with a question mark. |
0:32.5 | So, hey, Patreon subscribers, |
0:34.4 | thank you so much for your support and your feedback. |
0:39.1 | So if you haven't listened to Part 1, it dropped here on Patreon and on the main feed this past Saturday, and I encourage you to |
0:44.3 | scroll back and listen to that first. It focuses on clearing out the philosophical and psychological |
0:49.6 | cobwebs that turn every discussion about how to resist fascism into a discussion about manners |
0:55.9 | and decorum and spirituality. And one focus was on a short episode in the life of my late friend, |
1:02.1 | the Buddhist teacher Michael Stone, in which I tried to illustrate how the morality of nonviolence |
1:07.7 | through a reductive reading of Gandhi can promote an unrealistic idealism among |
1:13.8 | those who aren't really thinking about the strategic goals of direct action. And I invoke the |
1:18.9 | notion of political bypassing to describe the ideological commitment to nonviolence for its own |
1:24.8 | sake. So in this episode and on that note, I'm going to lean into the work |
1:29.5 | of political scientist Ben Case to talk about how the psychological confusion over violence and |
1:35.0 | nonviolence is rooted in a false binary of poorly defined terms that has been retrenched by an |
1:42.7 | empirical claim from within the strategic nonviolence discourse that gained popularity in 2011. |
1:50.1 | Political scientists, Erica Chenoweth and Maria Stephan, essentially claimed to have validated that version of Indian history that imagined that independence was secured through pure |
2:01.2 | nonviolence. Case shows that they could only make that argument by ignoring a huge range |
... |
Please login to see the full transcript.
Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Derek Beres, Matthew Remski, Julian Walker, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.
Generated transcripts are the property of Derek Beres, Matthew Remski, Julian Walker and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.
Copyright © Tapesearch 2025.