4.2 β’ 10.3K Ratings
ποΈ 28 June 2018
β±οΈ 36 minutes
ποΈ Recording | iTunes | RSS
π§ΎοΈ Download transcript
Click on a timestamp to play from that location
0:00.0 | Hi and welcome to Undisclosed. This week we are bringing you a special bonus episode |
0:25.3 | in which we respond to a whole lot of listener questions and give you guys updates on some |
0:29.6 | of the cases we've covered in the past. My name is Robbie Jadry, I'm an attorney and author, |
0:33.6 | and I'm here with my colleagues Susan Simpson and Colin Miller. Hi, this is Colin Miller, |
0:37.6 | I'm an associate dean and professor at the University of South Carolina School of Law, |
0:41.2 | and I blogged evidence prof blog. Hey guys, this is Susan Simpson, I'm an attorney in Washington, |
0:45.3 | DC, and I blogged at the View from LL2. So before we dive into the questions we've gotten, |
0:50.8 | I just want to give our listeners a heads up, make sure you tune in next week, because next week we |
0:55.5 | launch into a long series, a new wrongful conviction case and you don't want to miss it. |
1:01.2 | In full disclosure, I am not sure at this point how we're going to number our episodes, because |
1:06.0 | I think this is season three, but that may be confusing given number of arcs we had recently. |
1:11.6 | Yeah, Susan taking lead on this investigation and knowing Susan's investigative prowess, |
1:18.0 | I'm guessing we're going to have a whole lot of episodes. So let's dive into the questions and |
1:24.3 | then I'll start with the first one that comes from Andrea CB. And she says, my question for the |
1:28.4 | upcoming episode is whether scotuses ruling on cell phone evidence will have any effect on a |
1:33.2 | non-case specifically as well as on other cases that relied on this type of evidence. Thanks for |
1:38.8 | everything you do. So maybe we should first talk about that ruling. Yeah, this was ruling by the |
1:44.4 | Supreme Court in a case called Carpenters versus United States. And the question dealt with law |
1:50.3 | enforcement obtaining location records based upon cell phone use. And this is a question under |
1:56.5 | the Fourth Amendment. Basically the question was there's a doctrine known as the Third Party |
2:00.6 | doctrine. So for instance, let's say my neighbor breaks into my house and discovers drugs, |
2:07.4 | they could turn it over to the police who could then use that against me without violating the |
... |
Please login to see the full transcript.
Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from mital, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.
Generated transcripts are the property of mital and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.
Copyright Β© Tapesearch 2025.