This is a clip from Bloody History.

You can access the entire episode now on our website and all podcast platforms.

What I wanted to mention to get you talking about was even from a warning from history and this book,

you demolish conventional understanding of the case as it was presented to us officially.

I mean, even within the Warren Commission, Corey, you're calling out actual testimony as fabrication.

Right.

Yeah.

So.

So I want the very thesis is about the idea that there were two Oswalds going back to the time he was a child and that this was some

part of part of some greater intelligence operation known as an identity transfer where somebody

acts as an identity donor and you have somebody who uses that identity in this case for most of

Oswald's life I believe you have two people using the same identity, and at times, a third person

using the identity, and even possibly more that we haven't even discovered yet, but it becomes

very clear that Oswald was engaged in something, going back to a time before there was a CIA,

before there was even an OSS, to when Oswald's name and his history start to appear in two different places.

Ultimately, when you create a timeline of Oswald's life, you get two timelines.

And so the person who really brought this to the forefront, if you can say that, was John Armstrong,

whose work today is mostly marginalized.

And the reason work is mostly marginalized is because the conclusions that he drew as far as the assassination go,

and the conclusions that he drew as far as the two Oswald's go, he couldn't tell when one story ended and another began.

And he melded them all together into one big story.

So all of the duplicate Oswald stuff that occurs during the assassination that I attribute to

...