meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
At Barron's

Billionaire Investor Howard Marks on Ownership vs. Debt

At Barron's

At Barron's

Business

4.717 Ratings

🗓️ 7 November 2024

⏱️ 21 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

Howard Marks, co-chairman of the alternative investment manager Oaktree Capital Management, explains what distinguishes ownership and debt—and how they relate to two of the most popular investment types: stocks and bonds.

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

Hello everyone and welcome to Ed Barron's. I'm Andy Surwer.

0:08.0

And welcome to our guest Howard Marks, co-chairman of Oak Tree Capital.

0:12.0

Howard, great to see you.

0:13.0

Nice to see you, Andy.

0:14.0

So first of all, can you tell us a little bit about Oak Tree for people who aren't familiar with the firm?

0:19.0

Well, Oak Tree is a global alternative investment manager, which basically means not mainstream

0:25.9

stocks and bonds, with its roots and credit.

0:30.2

We're approaching 30 years old, and we're around $200 billion under management.

0:36.6

And Brookfield is now the owner of the company.

0:38.9

You guys have a big stake in it, the original partners, right?

0:41.5

Well, they may say the owner.

0:42.9

We may say they're our partner.

0:45.8

Brookfield has bought out the public and bought part of our stake, and they now own 68%.

0:52.0

And employees, ex-employees, and founders own the remaining 32 percent.

0:58.2

Jumping right into some of the topics you like to talk about, which includes risk, and I know you did a

1:03.2

video recently about the misconceptions that people have about risk. What are they, and can you

1:10.0

explain what you meant by that? Well, the main misconception, Andy, is that people have about risk. What are they, and can you explain what you meant by that?

1:11.6

Well, the main misconception, Andy, is that people want to be able to take the word risk

1:18.6

or the concept of risk and use it in a formula to do computations to figure out what are the

1:23.6

best possible alternatives and how did people do well in the past in a risk-adjusted

1:28.9

sense. So the only number that's available for them to use as a proxy for risk is volatility

1:35.8

or the standard deviation of prices or returns. So they do. I think that that's not what risk is. Risk is, really, if you think about it,

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from At Barron's, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of At Barron's and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2025.