Anyway, Bill O'Reilly is here with his take on that and much more.

Don't forget Bill's new book is out and doing, by the way, what is your book number

for? You've been on the list for how many weeks now? Yeah, killing the SS been on a 15 weeks,

I believe. And I appreciate you reading it, Annie. And that was really nice of you. I know

busy. No, I actually have read the whole book cover to cover. I learned a lot. I read

a business guy in a country. Thanks a lot, Bill. I really. I'm trying to, I'm trying

to rest, but it's a little hard. Let me ask you specifically. Let's go into where this

all started and how it evolved in the New York Times over the weekend and how, you know,

because to me, this is right and wrong. This isn't left or right. This isn't Republican

or Democrat. But this is American. This is a real threat to our republic. So the story

that broke Friday night printed in the New York Times newspaper on Saturday was written

by three people, Adam Goldman, Michael Schmidt and Nicholas Fandos. Okay. Now all three of

them have a track record of despising Donald Trump. So everybody should know that right

away. Right. These aren't friendly or fair reporters. This piece was planted. You've

heard that phrase. I'm sure that you plant stories. Both parties do it. They give to

favorable reporters a scenario they want to see to damage somebody. And obviously this

is the headline is obvious. FBI Open inquiry into whether Trump was secretly working on

behalf of Russia. Can't get more sensational than that. You cannot. So that headline damns

the president of the United States. You read the article there is as you pointed out, not

one shred of evidence to back up the headline. When I was in Boston University 45 years

ago, our first class said you cannot put a story out unless you have evidence. The

story is true. These reporters have no evidence. They took anonymous sources as they always

...