Believe it or not with all that is at stake in Georgia with the allegations of a

president who tried to steal an election this business, this legal drama about this messy business, is now

threatening the future of District Attorney Willis's role at the helm of this important

case.

Let's bring in my colleague and friend,

seeing an anchor, senior legal analyst, Laura Coates.

Laura, so bottom line, do you think the witness,

Mr Bradley, do you think his testimony has undermined Fannie Willis's credibility?

I think it has undermined the credibility of the arguments made by both Nathan

Willis, Nathan Wade, excuse me,, and also funny Willis for these reasons.

First of all, here's why we're here.

This person you may recall was already called to testify about a week and a half ago.

The reason he left is because of the attorney client privilege.

Now you know if you are actually communicating with your attorney in furtherance of getting legal advice,

it is privilege and that privilege belongs to the client, not the attorney.

The judge had what was called an in-camera discussion.

That's a fancy way of saying, you and I are going to talk one-on-one

with no one present.

I'm going to determine whether or not your conversations that you had should fall within that privilege.

The judge made a ruling.

They said, look, as it relates to communications about whether there was a relationship

between Fannie Willis and Nathan Wade.

...