#Bestof2022: Waiting for SCOTUS. 1/2: Asking SCOTUS to answer Affirmative Action's history and unknowns. @RichardAEpstein, @HooverInst
The John Batchelor Show
John Batchelor
4.5 • 2.8K Ratings
🗓️ 14 March 2023
⏱️ 12 minutes
🧾️ Download transcript
Summary
@Batchelorshow
1949
#Bestof2022: Waiting for SCOTUS. 1/2: Asking SCOTUS to answer Affirmative Action's history and unknowns. @RichardAEpstein, @HooverInst
https://www.hoover.org/research/affirmative-action-showdown
Transcript
Click on a timestamp to play from that location
| 0:00.0 | This is CBS I In The World. I'm John Bachelot. A affirmative action. The Supreme Court |
| 0:10.3 | in hearing a presentation by two different cases. Students for Farad missions incorporated |
| 0:17.4 | versus the President and Fellows of Harvard and the same organization. Students for Farad |
| 0:22.3 | missions versus the University of North Carolina. Introduces again the history of affirmative |
| 0:28.7 | action and before that we reach back to the Civil War period because it begins with the |
| 0:34.2 | 14th Amendment I learned from Professor Richard Epstein of the Hoover Institution. He teaches |
| 0:40.0 | law at the University of Chicago and NYU writing and defining ideas. Richard, the you present |
| 0:47.7 | this as an historical momentum reaching back to the 19th century. So before we come to |
| 0:53.6 | the prospects of the court, the present court, I want to start in 1868 and the 14th Amendment |
| 1:01.4 | because you identify that as critical as making what should say the original error that needed |
| 1:08.5 | to be corrected over the next 100 years. The word is protection. What was the error there that |
| 1:14.5 | either the lawmakers didn't understand or later was useful to the adversaries of tolerance. |
| 1:23.4 | Yeah, well, it's actually a very important question. The government in this world does two things. |
| 1:28.4 | One is what it does is it takes things from you and the other thing that it does is it gives |
| 1:33.8 | things to you and the question is what does the protection clause cover and any answer seems to |
| 1:39.7 | have been historically that they were worried about the enforcement of the criminal law and they |
| 1:44.1 | wanted to deal with questions of differential enforcement. They wanted to make it clear that if |
| 1:48.5 | you were a black person, you could not be subject to most of your sanctions and that if you were a |
| 1:52.8 | white person, you could not get off. So essentially, whether you were plaintive or defendant, they wanted to |
| 1:57.5 | make this thing race neutral. To this very day, there is nobody I think who seriously opposes that |
| 2:02.7 | particular notion and says that when it comes to burglary charges, we give heaven punishment to |
| 2:07.4 | blacks or to white. But the other thing that the government does is it gives things away. In 1868, it was |
... |
Please login to see the full transcript.
Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from John Batchelor, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.
Generated transcripts are the property of John Batchelor and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.
Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.

