Oh, yay, oh, yay, oh, yay, oh, yay.

The judicial power of the United States shall be vested in one Supreme Court.

Unless there is any more question to be able to find an argument in this case.

The whole person having business before the Honorable, the Supreme Court of the United States, are admonished to give their attention.

Welcome to Divided Argument, an unscheduled, unpredictable,

Supreme Court podcast.

I'm Dan Epps.

And I'm well-vote.

Okay, well, been a little bit of a gap, but not terrible since the last episode.

Some updates.

What have we got?

So one thing that we had last time was you expressed skepticism that there had ever been an event at which

members of the Federal Society chanted, just as Calea's dissent, and Morrison versus Olson.

And there's at least one media report coming for that, a piece by an interview with

Amanda Hollisbrowski, who's a political scientist who studies court, who reported that, a piece by an interview with Amanda Hollisproski, who's a political

scientist who studies court, who reported being at a book event with Justice Scalia, where people

started reading, the kind of fanboys started, like, chanting along with him as he read, he

weren't language from his famous descent in that case.

Yes, there is that report, and I have no reason to believe that report

is inaccurate, although I still have a hard time envisioning what this looks like. And I have a

hard time envision how many lines it is, because, like, I have read the Morrison versus Olson

dissent more than a lot of people, and I am pretty far in the just a Scalia fanboy thing. But without warning,

...