This is an I-Heart podcast.

You're listening to Fox Sports Radio.

If what you see contradicts your narrative, there tends not to be an overreaction.

And each individual looks at these games differently, but if it confirms your narrative, then

the overreaction is double.

And we've been waiting for Kansas City to have a good game.

Listen, in the last 21 games.

Now, there's only 16 games up until this year in the regular season.

So this is a year and a quarter of games. They're four, 16, and one against the spread.

So think about that. For every winner, there's been four losers. So think of it like this. Winner.

Loser, loser, loser, loser, loser. Winner. Luser, loser, loser. And it happens two more times like that.

On the extended edition of the show, you'll hear that, but we're cutting it out here.

It's the director's cut. All right, one more time. Winner, loser, loser, loser, loser. Now, at what point are we going to say? That's not so good. Someone called that 20%. I saw your lips moving. Were you trying to calculate it? I was trying to reach your calculator over there. I couldn't reach it, so I had to do it on my own.

You can use my calculator any time you want.

There we go.

And I was right, 20%.

Correct.

So what is it about this game that's any different or better than any other team that has these disparate results, meaning good and bad?

Usually a team that's 500 is good than bad,

then good, then bad, bad, bad. Not good than bad, bad, bad. How is this result for the

chiefs make them any more good than the Cowboys last week makes them the worst team in the league?

Or Jacksonville last week, making them good. Now, you've got a theory, which I think are some disputes about, but let's go over it because

...