4.6 • 949 Ratings
🗓️ 9 June 2025
⏱️ 14 minutes
🧾️ Download transcript
Caleb O. Brown hosted the Cato Daily Podcast for nearly 18 years, producing well over 4000 episodes. He has gone on to head Kentucky’s Bluegrass Institute. This is one among the best episodes produced in his tenure, selected by the host and listeners.
What should the U.S. do to adjust to China’s rise? Tariffs and shattering the global trading system aren’t the answer, according to Scott Lincicome.
Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Click on a timestamp to play from that location
0:00.0 | This is longtime Cato Daily podcast host, Caleb Brown. After thousands of episodes over nearly 18 years, |
0:05.7 | I've moved on from the Cater Daily podcast, but in the interim, I, along with some of you, |
0:10.9 | have selected some favorites. I hope they resonate with our current moment and continue to spark |
0:16.3 | the desire to defend liberty. Thank you for listening. |
0:21.6 | This is the Cato Daily podcast for Friday, February 15th, 2019. I'm Caleb Brown. Many critics of free trade |
0:29.1 | mark the moment the U.S. gave China permanent normal trade relations status as the moment when |
0:34.4 | China's relative rise truly began. |
0:40.7 | Scott Linscombe is a trade attorney and adjunct scholar at the Cato Institute. |
0:44.9 | We discussed China's rise and how the U.S. has failed to adjust. |
0:53.9 | If you watch the anger surrounding the fact that China seems to be getting the better of the United States, or at least that's how it's |
0:55.7 | presented to the public, given the fact that even our own trade people, yourself included, |
1:00.8 | would say, yeah, it's true. |
1:03.6 | There are substantial problems with the way that the U.S. and China engage on the trade |
1:10.3 | front. So to the extent that that is true.S. and China engage in on the trade front. So to the extent that that is true, |
1:14.5 | and the broader China's getting the better of us is at very least way overstated, you know, |
1:22.6 | draw that line. Yeah. So there is a huge difference between rightfully, I think, criticizing Chinese trade and economic behavior. And I think that there is a lot of academic support for the idea that Chinese imports in particularly after, between about 2000 to 2010, caused a pretty significant disruption for certain |
1:46.3 | manufacturing industries and communities in the United States, what they call the China shock. |
1:50.9 | That's all, I think, something that I or other trade advocates would completely acknowledge. |
1:57.8 | The difference, though, is first, drawing conclusions with respect to whether that means that we are winning or losing at trade. |
2:07.6 | Really, if you look at, again, those same analyses I just mentioned, they actually still show that the United States as a whole benefits from Chinese imports and from global competition |
2:19.3 | and from the rest of that stuff, even considering those disruptions I mentioned, that |
2:24.6 | the U.S. economy benefits from the type of economic dynamism that's injected when you have |
... |
Transcript will be available on the free plan in 21 days. Upgrade to see the full transcript now.
Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Cato Institute, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.
Generated transcripts are the property of Cato Institute and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.
Copyright © Tapesearch 2025.