Au Pair Affair Trial: VERDICT WATCH; Who Do Jurors Believe? The Au Pair or the Husband?
Amy & T.J.
iHeartPodcasts
4.4 • 3.2K Ratings
🗓️ 30 January 2026
⏱️ 28 minutes
🧾️ Download transcript
Summary
Two very different closing arguments in the double murder trial of Brendan Banfield. The defense ended strong, poking holes in the au pair’s testimony, saying none of it can be trusted, first because she has every incentive to cooperate with the prosecution and second, because the digital forensics don’t support the au pair’s and prosecution’s catfishing narrative. The prosecution sped though their closing, going through the evidence they presented, point by point, finishing in less than 20 minutes. There was no storytelling and little emotion, and ended with this conclusion: either you believe the au pair or you believe Brendan Banfield.
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Transcript
Click on a timestamp to play from that location
| 0:00.0 | This is an I-Heart podcast. |
| 0:02.6 | Guaranteed Human. |
| 0:14.2 | Hey there, folks. |
| 0:15.1 | It is Friday, January 30th, and the case is in the hands of the jury in the so-called Opaire affair murder trial. |
| 0:24.6 | Welcome to this episode of Amy and T.J. We have just been listening to the closing arguments this |
| 0:29.1 | morning. Totally different approaches by the attorneys. We'll get into that. But Roads, we've been |
| 0:33.6 | watching. This has been a national fascination in a lot of ways. And as of this moment, been about two hours. As we record this, the jury has been deliberating this man's fate. |
| 0:42.1 | Wow. I know. We have been watching every moment of testimony for the past three weeks. And to hear |
| 0:49.5 | the closing arguments this morning, to hear both attorneys sum up their cases. We had some strong reactions |
| 0:57.2 | based on all the testimony we've heard and you think about how unbelievable this trial was |
| 1:03.9 | to hear from the O'Pair herself and then to hear from the husband himself and have their dueling testimony be at the heart of this case. |
| 1:15.3 | And the jurors, according to the prosecution, literally has to decide who they believe. |
| 1:21.2 | Don't know how effective that strategy was, but we will get into that because as we are recording this, folks, |
| 1:27.4 | we just had a lunch in which we sat and |
| 1:29.6 | we couldn't come up with where we fall. If we were a juror and we were forced to take a vote, |
| 1:35.3 | we don't really know which way we would go. We'll get into what we think this jury is going to do. |
| 1:39.5 | But yes, you're up on it by now. Brendan Benfield accused of killing his wife and a stranger in a plot in which he arranged for him to come over and then take the fall for his wife's death, but end up murdering them all in a plan he hatched with the O'Pair that he was in an affair with at the time. |
| 1:55.5 | The appare, O'Pair, testified in this trial that there was this elaborate plot. |
| 1:59.6 | Brendan Banfield testified it wasn't |
| 2:02.1 | the case at all. She's just trying to get out of jail. So she did anything the prosecution would tell her. |
| 2:06.5 | Okay, we're all caught up. Good. So here we are, Roves, this is the, this is it. This is the last thing |
| 2:12.5 | that the jurors get to hear from either side, closing arguments. The prosecutor went first, defense went next, |
... |
Please login to see the full transcript.
Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from iHeartPodcasts, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.
Generated transcripts are the property of iHeartPodcasts and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.
Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.