Time now for the College Football Inquirer with Dan Wetzel.

Come at me, I get it. It's a very unpopular position. I understand. I get grilled on it every time. I will take unpopular positions.

I get why everyone in college athletics hates me. That doesn't matter. I'm right. You're wrong. I'm right.

S.I's Ross Gallagher.

I think it's like $8 billion, I know,

to fund something like that.

So this would be a catalyst you would think for Congress yet to move on something if they're going to lose the

college Olympic model.

And S.I's Pat 40!

Oh! Say, A through C, that's an S. S. Sailing is pretty far down the alphabet, but you just, that's the first one you came to.

Here's Pat Russ and Dan. I was on the pod that we were talking some

last week or last episode early this week about the looming possibility that a court or

somebody determines that college athletes are employees of their university and it is the biggest

change agent positive negative or not however you want to feel about it, that is kind of coming down the tracks.

And obviously people running college athletics can do more than one thing at a time, but so much of the focus is on things that at least I do not believe have significant impact or exponentially less

significant impact on how things are going like people transferring from

schools when this is the thing that people either need to prepare to block or encourage

or at least deal with. And although I mentioned the courts, in particular the Supreme Court, which has taken a very

anti amateurism of viewpoint going, go in the past, there's also state legislatures if you recall the reason

NILs became a thing was because the state of California passed it in 2019.

Bipartisan support in California and then signed in by Gavin Newsom and that

led other states of all different political ilks and control to follow suit and allow the original bill made it illegal for

...