You're listening to, atheistically speaking. I'm going to Hey everyone on today's episode we're just going to go and continue the

conversation from last episode with a ton of gusto and knowledge,

backstory and all that in terms of this court case and I found it very interesting and we're going to continue that and then after we're done with that discussion stay tuned for another one of my little

I don't know non segment little tidbits little little not directly atheism related but just just something that I brought up with

him that was a I thought an interesting thought but hopefully you'll feel the same but anyway

So I'd like to thank Noah again for coming on and enjoy this episode. I'll go ahead and start that interview now.

Well I think the other, you know the only point that, the only really big point that I think that we

haven't touched on is when you talk about the actually what

brought up the the discussion we had earlier on corporate personhood is what it

means for a company to exercise its religion.

Now, in oral arguments, Klemut, the guy who's arguing for Hobby Lobby,

was challenged to come up with an example.

And I've also heard several people who are you

know affiliated with different lawyers that are working this case on on NPR and on

CNN etc when they're posed to this question, they try to establish Hobby Lobby's religiousness through corporate policies.

You know, they say, well, you know, the store closes on Sundays and they pay higher than the average

wages and and they you know they they close their store early so that people can be

home with their families these are all things that come from their

religious belief not from their, you

know, whatever corporate desire to make more money.

Right.

I don't understand how any of that is relevant.

...