This is The Guardian.

Welcome to The Guardian long read, showcasing the best long-form journalism covering culture, politics and new thinking.

For the text version of this and all our long reads, go to the guardian.com forward slash long read.

Are we witnessing the death of international law by Linda Kinsler?

Read by Rachel Hanshaw.

In late April, terrorists killed 26 civilians in the Indian town of Baha'am, located in the mountainous border region of Kashmir. India swiftly blamed Pakistan for the attack, launched

missile strikes towards it, and announced that it was

suspending the Indus Waters Treaty, effectively threatening to cut off three quarters of

Pakistan's water supply.

Ahmad Irfan Aslam, a seasoned international lawyer who, until last year, was Pakistan's minister for law and justice,

water and natural resources, climate change, and investments, watched the news unfold with a

creeping sense of horror. India was raising the possibility that it could turn off the tap for

250 million people.

This would violate not only the treaty, but also international laws around the equitable use of water resources.

Colleagues and friends approached Aslam for guidance about what could be done.

That's when it struck him.

I had this scary realization that there isn't much one can do today, he told me.

We have witnessed a sudden erosion of multilateral institutions, of institutional norms.

Everything seems uncertain.

Even if Pakistan were to bring a complaint to one of the institutions created to settle disputes between states,

the UN Security Council and General Assembly, the International Court of Justice, ICJ,

or the Permanent Court of Arbitration, whatever decision that resulted

...