Hi, Jim.

Hi, Catherine.

So Jim, I've been following your Twitter, recently.

I've actually been checking in with it, and first of all all it's an odd mix of really earnest

information and then really sort of like odd jokes yeah um welcome to my life. Yeah, it's a real unique mix, which some could say undermines

your credibility as a, as a medical professional, but.

Wait, does humor undermine your credibility?

Yeah, I feel like you're supposed to be like a robot, like a fact robot.

And people are like, I trust that guy.

Have I ever been that?

But if you have a personality, you become untrustworthy, right?

So my idea is that there are plenty of people out there doing that, and we need lots of different styles of communication.

If there were like, here's the one way that science-minded people

communicate, and if you don't like that, you're not going to like science. Yeah.

I mean, obviously, I can only talk to you because you make stupid jokes.

So, okay, so speaking of scientific information and it being verifiable or not, I've been following your

Twitter and you've been tweeting about hydrochoxylchyloquial,

oh no.

Hydroxylauricquin. It's hard. Oh no she just

it's hard to say someone last time emailed us and said that they thought you were

being affected in your inability to pronounce that and I was like no she just really can't.

Anyway I got it down now hydroxyl chloric when you tweeted about it and you know I

...